Registration plate DY05FFN
Official local mnemonic: Deeside
Postal area: Shrewsbury
Issued: between march 2005 and august 2005
Black Hyundai Tucson, manufactured in 2005, first registered on 1 March 2005. Cylinder capacity: 1991cc, CO2 emissions: 210 g/km.
As of 27 April 2016 this vehicle had done 64,118 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 70,000 miles.
✓ Taxed Tax due: 1 August 2017
✗ No MOT Expired: 26 April 2017

MOT history

Test dateExpiry dateResultOdometer reading
2016-04-272017-04-26 Pass64,118
2016-04-27- Fail64,116
  • Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
  • Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
2015-04-102016-04-09 Pass57,977
  • Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
  • Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
2015-04-09- Fail57,977
  • Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
  • Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
2014-04-092015-04-08 Pass50,760
2014-03-192015-03-31 Pass50,615
2013-03-232014-03-31 Pass46,538
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
2012-03-142013-03-31 Pass42,418
2011-03-102012-03-31 Pass38,150
2010-03-252011-03-31 Pass34,933
  • Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  • Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
2009-03-092010-03-31 Pass30,728
  • Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
  • Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.C.1a)
  • Unable to check N/S/R seatbelt due to childs seat fitted
2008-03-262009-03-31 Pass26,529
  • N/S/F tyre worn on outside edge
2008-03-26- Fail26,529
  • N/S/F tyre worn on outside edge

Rate driver

1
8

Comments

DY05 FFN 2017-04-20 20:31:02

Then why let her? You could of followed the vehicle in front and sat it out with her if it bothered you that much.
Rate this comment:
1
+
-
DY05 FFN 2017-04-21 15:05:24

And is that not better than sitting it out with her and causing a bigger problem as you suggest?
Rate this comment:
3
+
-
DY05 FFN 2017-04-21 13:40:42

All well and good, except he / she hasn't risen above it, they scurried home to post it here calling her a bitch.
Rate this comment:
3
+
-
DY05 FFN 2017-04-21 11:32:34

what would sitting it out achieve apart from more delay, frustration & possible confrontation??? baz you are a dick
Rate this comment:
3
+
-
DY05 FFN 2017-04-21 11:30:54

@ bazz davy - if that's how you would handle the situation then you should not be on the road
Rate this comment:
2
+
-
DY05 FFN 2017-04-21 03:12:36

Agreed

Dashcam driver was being responsible (rising above it)

I think the situation got frustrating because of the other silver car wanting to park up in that disabled spot then either can't actually park up or isn't disabled so then they drove on.

Yes the bitch should have waited but the silver car was the underlying indecisive control of the vehicle
Rate this comment:
6
+
-
DY05 FFN 2017-04-20 22:10:49

Because they're rising above it, that's why.
Rate this comment:
4
+
-
DY05 FFN 2017-04-20 17:56:55



Not her right of way but shes coming through anyway!
Rate this comment:
8
+
-

Add comment

Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Select files
Select file

You agree that you accept our rules

Worst drivers in April

  1. RE60 KFK
  2. MX08 PNZ
  3. LF06 UHP
  4. S44 REJ
  5. LL14 YON
  6. RA16 DDL
  7. LM60 YOO
  8. Y510 CZZ
  9. ET59 EDC
  10. WJ15 PHN
View drivers' rankings from previous months »
Recently accessed: