Registration plate HV57HRM
Official local mnemonic: Hampshire and Dorset
Postal area: Portsmouth
Issued: between september 2007 and february 2008
Silver Peugeot 307, manufactured in 2007, first registered on 1 September 2007. Cylinder capacity: 1560cc, CO2 emissions: 129 g/km.
As of 24 August 2017 this vehicle had done 168,557 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 233,400 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 September 2019
✗ No MOT Expired: 7 September 2019

MOT history

Test dateExpiry dateResultOdometer reading
2017-08-242018-09-07 Pass168,557
  • Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
  • Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
  • Oil leak ()
  • Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • rear suspension axel rubber bushes are perished
  • vehicle rear floorpan is corroded
  • Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
  • engine management light is on
  • vehicle has covers fitted unable to see certain testable items
2017-08-24- Fail168,557
  • Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
  • Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
  • Oil leak ()
  • Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • rear suspension axel rubber bushes are perished
  • vehicle rear floorpan is corroded
  • Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
  • engine management light is on
  • vehicle has covers fitted unable to see certain testable items
  • Nearside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
2016-09-082017-09-07 Pass159,206
  • Low on coolant
2016-09-08- Fail159,206
  • Low on coolant
  • Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
  • Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
2015-07-152016-07-18 Pass148,338
2014-07-192015-07-18 Pass133,952
  • Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
  • Nearside Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • Offside Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • Play in steering rack inner joint(s)
2014-07-19- Fail133,952
  • Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
  • Nearside Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • Offside Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • Play in steering rack inner joint(s)
  • Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
2013-09-202014-09-26 Pass120,026
  • Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
  • Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
2013-09-20- Fail120,026
  • Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
  • Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
  • Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
  • Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
2012-09-272013-09-26 Pass104,247
  • Nearside Rear position lamp(s) damaged, but still visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
2012-09-24- Fail104,156
  • Nearside Inner Ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
  • Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
  • Offside Rear position lamp(s) has less than 50% of the light sources illuminating (1.1.A.3b)
2011-09-092012-09-24 Pass88,519
  • Slight play N/S/F inner steering rack joint
2011-09-09- Fail88,519
  • Slight play N/S/F inner steering rack joint
  • Nearside Rear Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
  • Offside Rear Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
2010-09-162011-09-24 Pass70,315
  • front brake discs worn

Rate driver

0
3

Comments

HV57 HRM 2017-10-20 00:33:00

Bit of common sense would have been ideal here from the cyclist
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
HV57 HRM 2017-10-13 18:25:52

Hmm, not sure about that one. Both at fault.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
HV57 HRM 2017-10-14 00:03:57

Why both?
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
HV57 HRM 2017-10-13 15:07:40

Must be fucking blind
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
HV57 HRM 2017-10-16 15:37:12

@ 11:01:20. The cyclist wasn't undertaking. As shown in the video the cycle lane extends across the junction - traffic does not have priority over it, including turning traffic. The driver should have indicated earlier, waited, and proceeded only when it was safe to do so. Instead it took the driver one second to assess the situation, indicate, and start turning.

But I would like to see more footage. I want to see what happened before the start of this video.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
HV57 HRM 2017-10-16 15:30:48

* who is unsure
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
HV57 HRM 2017-10-16 15:29:57

Please show extended footage prior to the collision. I agree you were in 'somewhat' of a blind spot; the driver should still check their mirrors - but never assume they can, or will. I feel the driver checked and indicated way too late here and it is for this reason you should always try to create space and be prepared to stop. To any cyclist who insure: never, ever...ever..ride this close to HGV's near turning points. This is how many riders have unfortunately lost their lives.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
HV57 HRM 2017-10-16 06:13:09

They indicated too late but it also appears you were in their blind spot.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
HV57 HRM 2017-10-14 19:36:21

The driver slowed for the speed bump, and then indicated on a junction as opposed to doing so beforehand. How you can accuse the cyclist of undertaking an indicating vehicle is beyond me. As it's an old Peugeot, it more than likely has convex glass mirrors anyway, so it's less of an excuse to cut up a cyclist. You bark at them to use the cycle lanes, and when they do...
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
HV57 HRM 2017-10-14 11:01:20

If you try to undertake a car indicating left in their blind spot I suspect it is you that is fucking blind?
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
HV57 HRM 2017-10-14 08:43:40

Don't undertake. Won't happen.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-

Add comment

Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Select files
You agree that you accept our rules

Worst drivers in April

  1. V60 CDW
  2. EEZ 1314
  3. GF58 NXE
  4. BP68 KKH
  5. YJ59 HHE
  6. B16 TAJ
  7. DN18 FHV
  8. SP09 RKA
  9. TR12 CKS
  10. R18 NRC

View drivers' rankings from previous months »

Do you like us?
or transfer some Bitcoins to 1L9Sd6UhYrugmYzp8Zv4iQtZoLRLdvWHPV