Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: Yorkshire
Postal area: Leeds
Issued: between september 2007 and february 2008
Grey Ford Fiesta, manufactured in 2007, first registered on 1 September 2007. Cylinder capacity: 1560cc, CO2 emissions: 116 g/km.
As of 20 October 2017 this vehicle had done 115,633 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 166,700 miles.
Official local mnemonic: YorkshirePostal area: Leeds
Issued: between september 2007 and february 2008
Grey Ford Fiesta, manufactured in 2007, first registered on 1 September 2007. Cylinder capacity: 1560cc, CO2 emissions: 116 g/km.
As of 20 October 2017 this vehicle had done 115,633 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 166,700 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 28 December 2017
✗ No MOT Expired: 19 October 2018
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-20 | 2018-10-19 | ✓ Pass | 115,633 |
| 2016-08-08 | 2017-08-10 | ✓ Pass | 106,202 |
| |||
| 2016-08-08 | - | ✗ Fail | 106,202 |
| |||
| 2015-08-11 | 2016-08-10 | ✓ Pass | 98,565 |
| 2014-09-15 | 2015-09-28 | ✓ Pass | 92,101 |
| |||
| 2014-09-13 | - | ✗ Fail | 92,101 |
| |||
| 2013-09-21 | 2014-09-28 | ✓ Pass | 78,447 |
| 2012-09-01 | 2013-09-28 | ✓ Pass | 64,233 |
| 2011-09-16 | 2012-09-28 | ✓ Pass | 53,944 |
| |||
| 2011-09-15 | - | ✗ Fail | 53,944 |
| |||
| 2010-09-25 | 2011-09-28 | ✓ Pass | 42,629 |
Rate driver
Comments
YH57 VAO
2016-11-14 17:57:15
What To Do If You’re Confronted
Be respectful and polite. Use good judgement and don’t escalate the situation.
If the person becomes combative or difficult, think about calling the police.
Threats, detention, and taking your camera are all grounds for legal or civil actions on your part. Be sure to get the person’s name, employer, and what legal grounds they claim for their actions.
If you don’t want to involve the authorities, go above the person’s head to their supervisor or their company’s public relations department.
Call your local TV and radio stations and see if they want to do a story about your civil liberties.
Put the story on the web yourself if need be.
What To Do If You’re Confronted
Be respectful and polite. Use good judgement and don’t escalate the situation.
If the person becomes combative or difficult, think about calling the police.
Threats, detention, and taking your camera are all grounds for legal or civil actions on your part. Be sure to get the person’s name, employer, and what legal grounds they claim for their actions.
If you don’t want to involve the authorities, go above the person’s head to their supervisor or their company’s public relations department.
Call your local TV and radio stations and see if they want to do a story about your civil liberties.
Put the story on the web yourself if need be.
YH57 VAO
2016-11-13 02:37:03
its a fair point though you are a wierdo for taking pics of peoples cars for 'no reason'
its a fair point though you are a wierdo for taking pics of peoples cars for 'no reason'
YH57 VAO
John2016-11-13 14:33:53
It's not a fair point at all. It's a public area, he can take photos of whatever he desires
It's not a fair point at all. It's a public area, he can take photos of whatever he desires
YH57 VAO
Anonymous2016-11-11 19:39:47
Firstly, this guy had parked in a disabled bay without a blue badge.
Then I came out from the shop and he (typical 20-30s chav resting against his car having a cig) had waited to confront me, then calls me "fucking strange" for taking a photo of a car in a public place! I said that I took it because I wanted to, couldn't be bothered reasoning as he's clearly idiotic and stupid enough to not understand.
There is no law against taking photos in a public area. His parking was highly ignorant and inconsiderate, and the confrontation was completely unnecessary. Pathetic
Firstly, this guy had parked in a disabled bay without a blue badge.
Then I came out from the shop and he (typical 20-30s chav resting against his car having a cig) had waited to confront me, then calls me "fucking strange" for taking a photo of a car in a public place! I said that I took it because I wanted to, couldn't be bothered reasoning as he's clearly idiotic and stupid enough to not understand.
There is no law against taking photos in a public area. His parking was highly ignorant and inconsiderate, and the confrontation was completely unnecessary. Pathetic
YH57 VAO
2016-11-14 19:10:24
If the disability was her, then you are not allowed to use the badge to benefit a non-disabled user (being the driver). But looking from the picture showing the front windscreen (explains the pic from the front) there was no disabled badge on show. A warden would not take any excuses on that.
If the disability was her, then you are not allowed to use the badge to benefit a non-disabled user (being the driver). But looking from the picture showing the front windscreen (explains the pic from the front) there was no disabled badge on show. A warden would not take any excuses on that.
YH57 VAO
2016-11-14 18:55:06
And of course, it can be confusing and distressing for anyone to see someone taking pictures of them especially lone women. This regardless of whether you have that right. And if you were her boyfriend, husband, brother or son then you would automatically defend/protect her, because it's instinct. Does the up-loader appreciate this? She is the passenger, not the driver? Than one could have easily taken a picture whilst blurring her face or from the back of the vehicle? That maybe she stayed in the car because the badge-holder had forgot it? That she herself has limited mobility? Past a certain point you can still be right and lose your own argument because people will naturally be more interested in what you are upto than what they have done. That is why I always say be fair to others unless of course you are in abject danger. Some people are selfish and don't give a damn about disabled people, but the way I see the pictures don't show this to be so here. This is just my 2c and no offense to anyone. All the best.
And of course, it can be confusing and distressing for anyone to see someone taking pictures of them especially lone women. This regardless of whether you have that right. And if you were her boyfriend, husband, brother or son then you would automatically defend/protect her, because it's instinct. Does the up-loader appreciate this? She is the passenger, not the driver? Than one could have easily taken a picture whilst blurring her face or from the back of the vehicle? That maybe she stayed in the car because the badge-holder had forgot it? That she herself has limited mobility? Past a certain point you can still be right and lose your own argument because people will naturally be more interested in what you are upto than what they have done. That is why I always say be fair to others unless of course you are in abject danger. Some people are selfish and don't give a damn about disabled people, but the way I see the pictures don't show this to be so here. This is just my 2c and no offense to anyone. All the best.
YH57 VAO
Anon2016-11-14 18:28:56
2016-11-14 17:51:20 Just calm down and hold your horses for a second, will ya? Taking the picture doesn't automatically mean the person taking it is the things you mention, and the laws regarding rights to film a public place are there for a very good reason. I don't know the true circumstances surrounding this picture because as seems to be the case here (some) people post pictures without updates, or they post stupidity. So now, I don't think the uploader has been shown to be a perv and neither do I think the person in the car is evil. I wouldn't take a picture unless I had to; rather, I'd probably just tell the store or talk the people responsible like human beings. Taking a picture would be a last resort for me even though I may have every right. For what it's worth she's also quite nice-looking and I'm saying that generally not to mock anyone.
2016-11-14 17:51:20 Just calm down and hold your horses for a second, will ya? Taking the picture doesn't automatically mean the person taking it is the things you mention, and the laws regarding rights to film a public place are there for a very good reason. I don't know the true circumstances surrounding this picture because as seems to be the case here (some) people post pictures without updates, or they post stupidity. So now, I don't think the uploader has been shown to be a perv and neither do I think the person in the car is evil. I wouldn't take a picture unless I had to; rather, I'd probably just tell the store or talk the people responsible like human beings. Taking a picture would be a last resort for me even though I may have every right. For what it's worth she's also quite nice-looking and I'm saying that generally not to mock anyone.
YH57 VAO
adam2016-11-14 18:27:29
Terry & June, so for example dash cam footage with women in makes a driver a pedo? absolute bellend
Terry & June, so for example dash cam footage with women in makes a driver a pedo? absolute bellend
YH57 VAO
John2016-11-14 18:22:24
Are you fucking stupid? So if it was a male all alone in a car it would be considered perfectly acceptable? What the fuck has gender, or who's in the car got to do with the persons dodgy parking? I'm sure if the OP wanted a picture of the passenger, he'd make that the focus of the image, rather than the car! But as this is probably not the case, the OP has focussed the photo on the car being badly parked.
You're the fucking retarded sexist cunt!
Are you fucking stupid? So if it was a male all alone in a car it would be considered perfectly acceptable? What the fuck has gender, or who's in the car got to do with the persons dodgy parking? I'm sure if the OP wanted a picture of the passenger, he'd make that the focus of the image, rather than the car! But as this is probably not the case, the OP has focussed the photo on the car being badly parked.
You're the fucking retarded sexist cunt!
YH57 VAO
2016-11-14 17:51:20
Hey John (Reply) You stupid CUNT! Look at the full picture thick BASTARD! DOH! A female all alone in a car waiting for her boyfriend and this perverted uploader take a picture of her that tells me that the person that took the photo could be a sex offender perhaps and he has used the excuse of a car parking in a disable bay without a so called blue badge whilst he is getting off on the picture he just took and is still probally wanking still at this moment in time or maybe you JOHN! can tell if he is still tossing off as maybe the uploader is actually you because for simple reason why would you defend someone like this, So tell me are you married or living with a partner and if a stranger came along and took a random picture of your girlfriend then you would not be bothered as he wasn't doing anything wrong other than wanking of behind closed doors FUCKING RETARDED CUNT! now do us all a massive favour and FUCK OFF
Hey John (Reply) You stupid CUNT! Look at the full picture thick BASTARD! DOH! A female all alone in a car waiting for her boyfriend and this perverted uploader take a picture of her that tells me that the person that took the photo could be a sex offender perhaps and he has used the excuse of a car parking in a disable bay without a so called blue badge whilst he is getting off on the picture he just took and is still probally wanking still at this moment in time or maybe you JOHN! can tell if he is still tossing off as maybe the uploader is actually you because for simple reason why would you defend someone like this, So tell me are you married or living with a partner and if a stranger came along and took a random picture of your girlfriend then you would not be bothered as he wasn't doing anything wrong other than wanking of behind closed doors FUCKING RETARDED CUNT! now do us all a massive favour and FUCK OFF
YH57 VAO
John2016-11-13 14:33:02
How on earth is taking a photo of a car the reason to consider someone a pervert? Retard alert.
How on earth is taking a photo of a car the reason to consider someone a pervert? Retard alert.
YH57 VAO
Terry & June2016-11-13 10:56:59
Uploader your a PERVERT, Someone get his IP and report this perv to the police
Uploader your a PERVERT, Someone get his IP and report this perv to the police
YH57 VAO
2016-11-13 03:25:23
Folks, let's cut the crap and get down to the facts, yeah? Seems you're not dealing rights and wrongs here: you're dealing with inflated male ego. Woman in the car? Someone taking pictures of the car seemingly not having a designated badge allowing them to park in that spot? Well the rest is going to be history. I don't know how the person who took this picture approached the situation beyond the obvious desire to take a snap; did they for instance, have a polite word in their ear? We just don't know. But what history teaches us is that, beyond a certain point is basically comes down to who has the biggest balls. I see people parking in disabled bays all the time.. why don't the fucking STORES do more? It's not really safe for members of the public to do their job. And one of the worst culprits here, it seems, is ASDA. Their parking is shit. Their security (lol) is shit. The design of the store entrance is..shit. Alas, I am digressing here. Suffice to say, how was this approached? That's all I ask. You'll never stop the problem of people who are not entitled parking in disabled bays until these stores, councils, and the courts, take a much sterner view on the situation. Don't put yourself at risk doing their job.
Folks, let's cut the crap and get down to the facts, yeah? Seems you're not dealing rights and wrongs here: you're dealing with inflated male ego. Woman in the car? Someone taking pictures of the car seemingly not having a designated badge allowing them to park in that spot? Well the rest is going to be history. I don't know how the person who took this picture approached the situation beyond the obvious desire to take a snap; did they for instance, have a polite word in their ear? We just don't know. But what history teaches us is that, beyond a certain point is basically comes down to who has the biggest balls. I see people parking in disabled bays all the time.. why don't the fucking STORES do more? It's not really safe for members of the public to do their job. And one of the worst culprits here, it seems, is ASDA. Their parking is shit. Their security (lol) is shit. The design of the store entrance is..shit. Alas, I am digressing here. Suffice to say, how was this approached? That's all I ask. You'll never stop the problem of people who are not entitled parking in disabled bays until these stores, councils, and the courts, take a much sterner view on the situation. Don't put yourself at risk doing their job.
YH57 VAO
2016-11-11 23:05:09
YH57VAO driver, have a read of this
http://www.photographersrights.org.uk/page6/page6.html
YH57VAO driver, have a read of this
http://www.photographersrights.org.uk/page6/page6.html
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
The Ten Legal Commandments of Photography
I. Anyone in a public place can take pictures of anything they want. Public places include parks, sidewalks, malls, etc. Malls? Yeah. Even though it’s technically private property, being open to the public makes it public space.
II. If you are on public property, you can take pictures of private property. If a building, for example, is visible from the sidewalk, it’s fair game.
III. If you are on private property and are asked not to take pictures, you are obligated to honor that request. This includes posted signs.
IV. Sensitive government buildings (military bases, nuclear facilities) can prohibit photography if it is deemed a threat to national security.
V. People can be photographed if they are in public (without their consent) unless they have secluded themselves and can expect a reasonable degree of privacy. Kids swimming in a fountain? Okay. Somebody entering their PIN at the ATM? Not okay.
VI. The following can almost always be photographed from public places, despite popular opinion:
accident & fire scenes, criminal activities
bridges & other infrastructure, transportation facilities (i.e. airports)
industrial facilities, Superfund sites
public utilities, residential & commercial buildings
children, celebrities, law enforcement officers
UFOs, the Loch Ness Monster, Chuck Norris
VII. Although “security” is often given as the reason somebody doesn’t want you to take photos, it’s rarely valid. Taking a photo of a publicly visible subject does not constitute terrorism, nor does it infringe on a company’s trade secrets.
VIII. If you are challenged, you do not have to explain why you are taking pictures, nor to you have to disclose your identity (except in some cases when questioned by a law enforcement officer.)
IX. Private parties have very limited rights to detain you against your will, and can be subject to legal action if they harass you.
X. If someone tries to confiscate your camera and/or film, you don’t have to give it to them. If they take it by force or threaten you, they can be liable for things like theft and coercion. Even law enforcement officers need a court order.