Registration plate 
Black Bmw X5, manufactured in 2001, first registered on 1 May 2001. Cylinder capacity: 2979cc, CO2 emissions: 310 g/km.
As of 24 April 2018 this vehicle had done 141,687 miles.
Black Bmw X5, manufactured in 2001, first registered on 1 May 2001. Cylinder capacity: 2979cc, CO2 emissions: 310 g/km.As of 24 April 2018 this vehicle had done 141,687 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 May 2020
✗ No MOT Expired: 21 May 2020
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-24 | 2019-04-23 | ✓ Pass | 141,687 |
| |||
| 2017-04-12 | 2018-04-11 | ✓ Pass | - |
| |||
| 2017-04-12 | - | ✗ Fail | - |
| |||
| 2016-04-04 | 2017-04-08 | ✓ Pass | 131,072 |
| |||
| 2015-04-09 | 2016-04-08 | ✓ Pass | 126,265 |
| 2015-04-08 | - | ✗ Fail | 126,264 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2015-08-03 | ✓ Pass | 120,305 |
| |||
| 2014-07-21 | - | ✗ Fail | 120,256 |
| |||
| 2013-07-19 | 2014-08-03 | ✓ Pass | 109,954 |
| 2013-07-19 | - | ✗ Fail | 109,953 |
| 2012-07-21 | 2013-08-03 | ✓ Pass | 98,487 |
| 2011-07-11 | 2012-08-03 | ✓ Pass | 90,734 |
| 2010-07-06 | 2011-08-03 | ✓ Pass | 79,954 |
| 2009-07-24 | 2010-08-03 | ✓ Pass | 72,404 |
| |||
| 2008-08-04 | 2009-08-03 | ✓ Pass | 59,080 |
| |||
| 2008-01-22 | 2009-01-23 | ✓ Pass | 54,915 |
| 2006-12-29 | 2008-01-23 | ✓ Pass | 45,463 |
| |||
| 2006-01-24 | 2007-01-23 | ✓ Pass | 40,270 |
Rate driver
Comments
Y448 AKK
Eren2016-04-14 04:56:17
Do you do realise the road narrows? That there are parked vehicles? The cyclist could use any part of that lane, especially if they need to avoid pot-holes and uneven surfaces. Regardless of whether the cyclist was to the left, centre or right, the responsibility is on the driver to over-take correctly.. clearly they chose not to. Blaming the cyclist is just blaming the victim of the driver's idiocy.
Do you do realise the road narrows? That there are parked vehicles? The cyclist could use any part of that lane, especially if they need to avoid pot-holes and uneven surfaces. Regardless of whether the cyclist was to the left, centre or right, the responsibility is on the driver to over-take correctly.. clearly they chose not to. Blaming the cyclist is just blaming the victim of the driver's idiocy.
Y448 AKK
onlyme2016-04-13 10:29:18
Have to agree - BMW driver needs extended driving test but so does the cyclist if one was available
@ 12.55 (in the longer version video the cyclist is in a right turn lane but then changes lane into the straight on lane.
I'm all for taking primary "when necessary" but there's taking primary and taking the piss
Have to agree - BMW driver needs extended driving test but so does the cyclist if one was available
@ 12.55 (in the longer version video the cyclist is in a right turn lane but then changes lane into the straight on lane.
I'm all for taking primary "when necessary" but there's taking primary and taking the piss
Y448 AKK
Captain Sensible2016-04-13 09:17:00
Not defending the BMW driver (and never would) but as a fellow cyclist I can't see how you can defend cycling in this position as reasonable "taking the lane."
Not defending the BMW driver (and never would) but as a fellow cyclist I can't see how you can defend cycling in this position as reasonable "taking the lane."
Y448 AKK
Matt2022-12-01 17:25:57
Moving at the speed limit. There's literally no problem in taking the lane if I'm not holding anyone up who's travelling at the legal limit.
Moving at the speed limit. There's literally no problem in taking the lane if I'm not holding anyone up who's travelling at the legal limit.
Y448 AKK
Sid2016-04-13 08:48:08
You're cycling in the middle of the road as soon as you set off from the lights! Pull over to the left and allow the traffic to pass! You were asking for a reaction from holding up the driver behind. Idiot.
You're cycling in the middle of the road as soon as you set off from the lights! Pull over to the left and allow the traffic to pass! You were asking for a reaction from holding up the driver behind. Idiot.
Y448 AKK
Eren2016-04-14 04:53:06
Middle of the road? Then so was the car. The cyclist has every right to ride primary including to deter stupid over-takes. If you look, riding to the left would have put the cyclist in the door zone. The only thing holding up the driver was their own arrogant selfishness.. can use full lane get used to it.
Middle of the road? Then so was the car. The cyclist has every right to ride primary including to deter stupid over-takes. If you look, riding to the left would have put the cyclist in the door zone. The only thing holding up the driver was their own arrogant selfishness.. can use full lane get used to it.
Y448 AKK
SHIRLEY BUCKFIELD2016-04-12 09:36:04
There is riding primary and there is riding along the dotted centre line just to be militant and aggravate drivers. Regardless, the driver is a twat.
There is riding primary and there is riding along the dotted centre line just to be militant and aggravate drivers. Regardless, the driver is a twat.
Y448 AKK
Anon2016-04-13 05:12:01
If it's true what you say that copper really does need sacking. Look at where the incident happened.. there is no cycle lane. Further, national advice from government and the AA, RAC and several police forces.. as well as the fucking Highway Code.. is for cyclists to stay CLEAR of the DOOR ZONE and to ride CENTRAL where appropriate (ddhhhh..jeeze what's that copper, a pinch point ahead? Amazing aren't they). Seems that what you are doing here is falsifying information and victim blaming, it makes me fucking savage because it's clear to anyone with half a brain that the driver is at fault. Do you read? Do you understand "CAN LEGALLY USE FULL LANE"? Do you fucking even know that cyclists have the same rights as cars? Apparently not. You just concentrate on the swearing under duress though, I mean, look at the damage that can cause compared to a prick running you over with a couple of tons of metal. These evil cyclists thinking their life matters. I want to see this resolved and I am waiting for this to go viral.
If it's true what you say that copper really does need sacking. Look at where the incident happened.. there is no cycle lane. Further, national advice from government and the AA, RAC and several police forces.. as well as the fucking Highway Code.. is for cyclists to stay CLEAR of the DOOR ZONE and to ride CENTRAL where appropriate (ddhhhh..jeeze what's that copper, a pinch point ahead? Amazing aren't they). Seems that what you are doing here is falsifying information and victim blaming, it makes me fucking savage because it's clear to anyone with half a brain that the driver is at fault. Do you read? Do you understand "CAN LEGALLY USE FULL LANE"? Do you fucking even know that cyclists have the same rights as cars? Apparently not. You just concentrate on the swearing under duress though, I mean, look at the damage that can cause compared to a prick running you over with a couple of tons of metal. These evil cyclists thinking their life matters. I want to see this resolved and I am waiting for this to go viral.
Y448 AKK
Anon2016-04-13 05:05:45
Their choice of whether or not to use cycle lane has got FUCK ALL to do with that SHIT driving from selfish PRAT.
Their choice of whether or not to use cycle lane has got FUCK ALL to do with that SHIT driving from selfish PRAT.
Y448 AKK
Anon2016-04-13 05:03:35
And Mr. plod.. he's some "mitigating circumstance": when someone almost runs you over with a car.. the natural reaction is fear and panic; as in, acting under duress. Fucking useless jobsworth's in this world.
And Mr. plod.. he's some "mitigating circumstance": when someone almost runs you over with a car.. the natural reaction is fear and panic; as in, acting under duress. Fucking useless jobsworth's in this world.
Y448 AKK
Anon2016-04-13 05:01:41
Matt, if you're reading this.. get everything in writing and see a solicitor. The cop seems somewhat pig-headed.. the Section 59 offence is also just to throw you off the scent because the cops just can't be bothered doing their job. And IF there was nothing wrong in what the driver did.. why did they get sent on a driver awareness course? Because the cop in question sounds like they have a big mouth and a pee brain. Seriously, get it in writing and take it to the PCC after you've taken some advice from a solicitor. And take it to the media.. too many cyclists are dying on our roads because of prick-headed drivers and prick-headed police officers who can't be bothered to keep the oath they swore. Fucking pathetic response to your plight by them - let's see real justice prevail.
Matt, if you're reading this.. get everything in writing and see a solicitor. The cop seems somewhat pig-headed.. the Section 59 offence is also just to throw you off the scent because the cops just can't be bothered doing their job. And IF there was nothing wrong in what the driver did.. why did they get sent on a driver awareness course? Because the cop in question sounds like they have a big mouth and a pee brain. Seriously, get it in writing and take it to the PCC after you've taken some advice from a solicitor. And take it to the media.. too many cyclists are dying on our roads because of prick-headed drivers and prick-headed police officers who can't be bothered to keep the oath they swore. Fucking pathetic response to your plight by them - let's see real justice prevail.
Y448 AKK
Anon2016-04-13 04:56:55
"Failure to use cycle lanes" is about as valid as saying failure to drive at 1000 mph - a court judge would have a field day with it. Come on go for it.. let's see who's wrong on traffic law, shall we..on the Highway Code? I fucking bet £100 that copper is apparently talking out their arsehole.
"Failure to use cycle lanes" is about as valid as saying failure to drive at 1000 mph - a court judge would have a field day with it. Come on go for it.. let's see who's wrong on traffic law, shall we..on the Highway Code? I fucking bet £100 that copper is apparently talking out their arsehole.
Y448 AKK
Anon2016-04-13 04:54:49
Quote the author: "I supplied this video footage to the police as a whole, unedited. They declined to investigate further, citing my swearing after the incident and my failure to use cycle lanes later in the video as 'mitigating circumstances'. After chasing the incident, they agreed to send the driver an advisory letter about the incident, but also told me I was lucky I wasn't being charged with a public order offense for swearing."
Whoever said that should be fired. How can not using a cycle lane be mitigating circumstance when they are NOT compulsory; that the choice made by the cyclist is to be done so WITHOUT PREJUDICE? That copper seems to be as as bad as that driver! I'd seriously contact the Police Complaints Commission over this - as well as the media.
Quote the author: "I supplied this video footage to the police as a whole, unedited. They declined to investigate further, citing my swearing after the incident and my failure to use cycle lanes later in the video as 'mitigating circumstances'. After chasing the incident, they agreed to send the driver an advisory letter about the incident, but also told me I was lucky I wasn't being charged with a public order offense for swearing."
Whoever said that should be fired. How can not using a cycle lane be mitigating circumstance when they are NOT compulsory; that the choice made by the cyclist is to be done so WITHOUT PREJUDICE? That copper seems to be as as bad as that driver! I'd seriously contact the Police Complaints Commission over this - as well as the media.
Y448 AKK
Anon2016-04-13 04:49:17
Dickhead who clearly didn't like cyclists using the cycle box and getting in front for their own safety and to remain visible (oh the nerve). That dick-head on a moped also wants to grow some brains. And I note the 20 zone.. these pricks want their license revoking.
Dickhead who clearly didn't like cyclists using the cycle box and getting in front for their own safety and to remain visible (oh the nerve). That dick-head on a moped also wants to grow some brains. And I note the 20 zone.. these pricks want their license revoking.
Y448 AKK
onlyme2016-04-12 09:24:24
Just some nutter who thinks because of Road Tax only cars and lorries can use it and cyclists should fuck off and ride the pavements or die.
Diagnosed this from the video - clearly to drive a BMW you must be lacking capacity. Having zero understanding of the Highway Code or still believing in Road Tax is a clear sign of dementia coupled with schizophrenia
The driver is a danger to themselves as well as other members of the public. Do Not, I repeat Do Not approach this driver they are extremely dangerous and maybe armed with a large mouth and an enormous middle finger, Just contact the police explaining that you have seen this vehicle and your life is therefore in danger.
Just some nutter who thinks because of Road Tax only cars and lorries can use it and cyclists should fuck off and ride the pavements or die.
Diagnosed this from the video - clearly to drive a BMW you must be lacking capacity. Having zero understanding of the Highway Code or still believing in Road Tax is a clear sign of dementia coupled with schizophrenia
The driver is a danger to themselves as well as other members of the public. Do Not, I repeat Do Not approach this driver they are extremely dangerous and maybe armed with a large mouth and an enormous middle finger, Just contact the police explaining that you have seen this vehicle and your life is therefore in danger.
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Hi Everyone,
I'm the cyclist who supplied this footage to the police, then subsequently uploaded it to Youtube. Quite a surprise to come across this thread here!
I'll respond to some of the criticisms against me. Firstly, my cycling is not perfect throughout the video. However, it is safe and courteous. I do make a couple of minor mistakes at a couple of points later in the footage, but I spot them and correct them safely. Part of the reason I film my rides is to see if there's anything I do wrong or fail to anticipate, and if there's anything I can learn from the footage.
I supplied the full footage to the police to make it clear that I had nothing to hide. There were no previous altercations with the driver before I positioned myself ahead of him at the lights. Had I known they would comb the footage for excuses to let the driver off, I might not have been so transparent.
In the footage, I position myself safely in the cycle box behind the moped. When the lights change I initially set off following the moped, accelerating quickly, until I spot the bus on the left signalling to pull out, so I slow down and take a wide line to accommodate the bus. The driver didn't pull out so I accelerated again into the 20mph zone. I was doing at least 20mph after this point so taking the lane really shouldn't be an issue here with anyone.
Following the incident - point taken, I was holding the primary at a slower speed, which I shouldn't have done (and normally wouldn't). I was still pretty shocked here and just gathering my senses. It was either a case of continue in the primary for a bit (I didn't want any further overtakes immediately) or pull off the road completely and wait a couple of minutes. I probably should have done the latter. However I also wanted to follow the driver and see if he pulled any further dangerous stunts, or if I could get a clear shot of his face. So that's the decision I made. Thankfully the other drivers around me were respectful enough not to try anything stupid.
I am writing up a blog dealing with my experiences with the police. I'm pretty shocked by their response.