Registration plate 
Silver Chevrolet Lacetti, manufactured in 2005, first registered on 1 January 2005. Cylinder capacity: 1598cc, CO2 emissions: 181 g/km.
As of 29 December 2016 this vehicle had done 75,395 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 172,700 miles.
Silver Chevrolet Lacetti, manufactured in 2005, first registered on 1 January 2005. Cylinder capacity: 1598cc, CO2 emissions: 181 g/km.As of 29 December 2016 this vehicle had done 75,395 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 172,700 miles.
SORN
✗ No MOT Expired: 28 December 2017
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-29 | 2017-12-28 | ✓ Pass | 75,395 |
| |||
| 2016-12-29 | - | ✗ Fail | 75,395 |
| |||
| 2015-12-05 | 2016-12-04 | ✓ Pass | 64,036 |
| |||
| 2015-12-04 | - | ✗ Fail | 64,017 |
| |||
| 2014-12-03 | 2015-12-02 | ✓ Pass | 58,452 |
| 2014-12-01 | - | ✗ Fail | 58,452 |
| 2014-01-21 | 2015-01-20 | ✓ Pass | 56,347 |
| |||
| 2013-02-09 | 2014-02-26 | ✓ Pass | 54,204 |
| |||
| 2013-02-09 | - | ✗ Fail | 54,204 |
| |||
| 2012-02-27 | 2013-02-26 | ✓ Pass | 47,270 |
| 2012-02-16 | - | ✗ Fail | 47,270 |
| |||
| 2011-01-13 | 2012-01-28 | ✓ Pass | 40,013 |
| 2010-01-25 | 2011-01-28 | ✓ Pass | 28,597 |
| 2009-01-28 | 2010-01-28 | ✓ Pass | 20,481 |
| |||
| 2008-01-28 | 2009-01-28 | ✓ Pass | 15,510 |
Rate driver
Comments
B3 NVM
2017-07-23 12:26:40
How many times is it now, that the simple question has been asked regarding what law these trolls/idiots claim is being violated? Four?
I mean come on. Four times and not one of them can answer it. Folks this is what happens when THEY know they are in the wrong. "Break the law expect to pay" can be applied to many situations..you'd think if they were so sure of themselves and distancing themselves from idiots with their heads stuck up their own arses, that they'd be able to at least specific this imaginary "law" they keep barking on about. They've done nothing. All they keep doing is circle-jerking.
Ladies and Gentlemen. Do not be fooled by these goons.
How many times is it now, that the simple question has been asked regarding what law these trolls/idiots claim is being violated? Four?
I mean come on. Four times and not one of them can answer it. Folks this is what happens when THEY know they are in the wrong. "Break the law expect to pay" can be applied to many situations..you'd think if they were so sure of themselves and distancing themselves from idiots with their heads stuck up their own arses, that they'd be able to at least specific this imaginary "law" they keep barking on about. They've done nothing. All they keep doing is circle-jerking.
Ladies and Gentlemen. Do not be fooled by these goons.
B3 NVM
2017-07-23 12:21:36
@23 09:28:25 Instead of making sweeping remarks completely devoid of context, why don't you say what law you appear to be implying one is breaking.
Also, I take it you think nothing pointing a camera inside a child's bedroom? Do you work for the BBC or TVL? Have a thing for kids do you?
@23 09:28:25 Instead of making sweeping remarks completely devoid of context, why don't you say what law you appear to be implying one is breaking.
Also, I take it you think nothing pointing a camera inside a child's bedroom? Do you work for the BBC or TVL? Have a thing for kids do you?
B3 NVM
2017-07-23 09:28:25
"2017-07-23 05:13:07" I like when either the uploader or a troll uploads comments like this one when they know they or those or in the wrong, Break the law expect to pay!
"2017-07-23 05:13:07" I like when either the uploader or a troll uploads comments like this one when they know they or those or in the wrong, Break the law expect to pay!
B3 NVM
2017-07-21 19:34:46
@18:10:54
How stupid can you get? Someone asks a clear, logical question and you duck it..again? I mean, if this were Germany during WWII would you be the type to calling Jews "scruffy" and forcing them to "pay" up? People like you were the reason they went to concentration camps and we gassed to death.
So instead of spouting logical fallacies you should grow up and respond to the question like a mature adult. See if you can - you fail.
@18:10:54
How stupid can you get? Someone asks a clear, logical question and you duck it..again? I mean, if this were Germany during WWII would you be the type to calling Jews "scruffy" and forcing them to "pay" up? People like you were the reason they went to concentration camps and we gassed to death.
So instead of spouting logical fallacies you should grow up and respond to the question like a mature adult. See if you can - you fail.
B3 NVM
2017-07-21 05:15:41
Your story/ignorant, preconceived notions of idiocy, still does not answer the simple and straightforward question:
WHAT LAW says you MUST have a TV LICENSE?
Your whole post completely and utterly avoids this simple question, instead you prefer to go off on some wild tangent regarding your ridiculous, preconceived notions regarding not only the the person(s) asking you the simple question above, but also other people you claim to know as your neighbours.
Neither are relevant.
Why are you so reluctant to answer the question? It's not hard.
Your story/ignorant, preconceived notions of idiocy, still does not answer the simple and straightforward question:
WHAT LAW says you MUST have a TV LICENSE?
Your whole post completely and utterly avoids this simple question, instead you prefer to go off on some wild tangent regarding your ridiculous, preconceived notions regarding not only the the person(s) asking you the simple question above, but also other people you claim to know as your neighbours.
Neither are relevant.
Why are you so reluctant to answer the question? It's not hard.
B3 NVM
CalTech2017-07-19 19:43:54
What's the betting 'Harvard' works for the BBC or TVL? Both entities who appear no strangers to courting controversy?
Oh,and Harvard. Making threats is a bad idea. When are you planning on carrying them out? You think you a law unto yourself? Seems that way.
Apparently you're using your imaginary laws to threaten one or more people, in more ways than one.
Feel free to state which, if any, law requires one to own a TV license. This fact alone has ousted you. If they are paying you..it looks like it's money well wasted!!
What's the betting 'Harvard' works for the BBC or TVL? Both entities who appear no strangers to courting controversy?
Oh,and Harvard. Making threats is a bad idea. When are you planning on carrying them out? You think you a law unto yourself? Seems that way.
Apparently you're using your imaginary laws to threaten one or more people, in more ways than one.
Feel free to state which, if any, law requires one to own a TV license. This fact alone has ousted you. If they are paying you..it looks like it's money well wasted!!
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Member of the public lawfully films a public place.