Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
2017-12-20 | 2018-12-19 | ✓ Pass | 98,506 |
- Offside Obligatory mirror damaged, but not seriously affecting the rear view (8.1.2a)
- Nearside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement lower arm rear bush (2.4.G.2)
- Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement lower arm rear bush (2.4.G.2)
- Nearside Front Suspension arm has slight play in a pin/bush lower arm front bush (2.4.G.2)
|
2016-11-16 | 2017-11-15 | ✓ Pass | 82,733 |
- engine management light on
- Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
- offside wing mirror housing missing
- chip in windscreen
|
2016-11-14 | - | ✗ Fail | 82,649 |
- engine management light on
- Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt ()
- offside wing mirror housing missing
- chip in windscreen
- offside front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
2015-11-02 | 2016-11-11 | ✓ Pass | 70,910 |
- offside rear Child seat fitted
- centre front Under bonnet covers fitted obscuring component's
- Under vehicle covers trays fitted obscuring component's
- offside rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- nearside rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
|
2014-11-12 | 2015-11-11 | ✓ Pass | 64,301 |
- Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
- Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
- Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
- Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
- Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
|
2013-10-30 | 2014-11-06 | ✓ Pass | 55,301 |
- Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
- Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
- Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
- Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
|
2012-10-19 | 2013-11-06 | ✓ Pass | 49,691 |
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
2011-11-07 | 2012-11-06 | ✓ Pass | 41,221 |
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Under body protection trays fitted preventing full inspection
|
2011-07-07 | 2012-07-10 | ✓ Pass | 40,528 |
2010-07-09 | 2011-07-10 | ✓ Pass | 35,348 |
2009-07-10 | 2010-07-10 | ✓ Pass | 27,923 |
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
"Invites the Audi driver to come past".
I disagree. The responsibility is on the driver to over-take only where safe, and practical; this irrespective of any or no over-taking "invite" on the part of the cyclist they in front of them.
I also disagree with the claim the cyclist was just trying to create footage for the sake of it. They could have been telling the driver they were being filmed simply as a defence mechanism. Most people in the cyclist's position will be acting under duress, which is understandable given the circumstance. At the same time, I would NEVER do what the cyclist did here in so far as continue - I would advise anyone to keep well away from drivers (or cyclists) with the same attitude as the driver shown here; do not engage unless you have to. They are simply not worth it. Let the camera do the talking. It's not worth it.
"Shouting out the reg did nothing to antagonise". I disagree with this statement also. The cyclist may simply be relaying the registration in the event the camera for whatever reason doesn't pick it up. Many drivers with dash-cams do the same. Even if this were done to "antagonise" the driver, that's the driver's problem: you're in public, with no expectation of privacy. The cyclist is also speaking to himself at the material time. If the driver or anyone for that matter can't deal with that then that really is their problem as far as I'm concerned.
All in all the driver shown here is in my opinion, being a dangerous imbecile; one who will, unless they improve their attitude, end up killing someone. The cyclist was to a large extent also acting mostly under duress, in my opinion. I am not anti-cyclist or anti-driver, either.