Registration plate DU05ZNC
Official local mnemonic: Deeside
Postal area: Shrewsbury
Issued: between march 2005 and august 2005
Blue Honda Accord, manufactured in 2005, first registered on 1 March 2005. Cylinder capacity: 2204cc, CO2 emissions: 143 g/km.
As of 13 July 2017 this vehicle had done 162,079 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 227,600 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 September 2017
✗ No MOT Expired: 1 August 2018

MOT history

Test dateExpiry dateResultOdometer reading
2017-07-132018-08-01✓ Pass162,079
  • Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (3.5.1i)
2016-08-022017-08-01✓ Pass153,695
2015-07-152016-07-16✓ Pass150,148
2014-07-172015-07-16✓ Pass145,957
  • n/s/r brakes have slight mist of oil but no leaks
2013-02-012014-01-31✓ Pass138,993
2013-01-31-✗ Fail138,993
2012-02-012013-01-31✓ Pass135,171
  • Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  • Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  • Offside Front Upper Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
  • Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • n/s/r wheel slightly binding
2012-02-01-✗ Fail135,171
  • Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  • Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  • Offside Front Upper Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
  • Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  • n/s/r wheel slightly binding
2010-12-06-✗ Fail129,680
  • Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • tyre cut
2010-12-062011-12-05✓ Pass129,680
  • Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • tyre cut
2010-05-132011-05-13✓ Pass126,528
  • Offside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
2009-05-132010-05-13✓ Pass116,926
  • rack/ tyre/
2008-05-142009-05-13✓ Pass105,752
  • Nail in nearside rear tyre
  • Both rear tyres wearing unevenly! Shouldering inner edges
2008-05-14-✗ Fail105,752
  • Nail in nearside rear tyre
  • Both rear tyres wearing unevenly! Shouldering inner edges

Rate driver

2
7

Comments

DU05 ZNC 2017-01-16 01:16:31

Whilst I consider what the driver did to be wrong, can I first address the cyclist's actions?

Basically, what the hell were you doing, cycling like that? I think I can sum it up on one phrase: 'red mist'. You were too close to the driver, and it wasn't safe to over-take there since you were all traveling at speed towards a junction with lights. Had you even got past, you would have undoubtedly cut them up - you wouldn't like that done to you, right? Not only that, you'd have also been straight into the path of a vehicle exiting right at the lights (which would have been green for them), namely a bus. I cycle and I would never, ever intentionally take those kinds of risks unless I had no other choice but it appeared to me you had a choice - and a responsibility - to simply stay back. You could have so easily been killed there.

OK, the driver. Apparently the police can't identify them due to false details on the car's documentation and insurance. If the date of this footage is legit then it would also mean they were driving untaxed, due to it expiring 05 Sep 2016 (it has not been renewed).

The driver appears to intentionally collide with stationary carriage in front (cyclist), and fails to stop at the scene of a collision. The only mitigating factors I can think of here in the driver's favor are thus. You see that traffic coming in the other direction? You see the red lights? It may be the driver was trying to stop you running into it or stop you from violently swerving in front of him and thus under his bonnet in the case he can't stop in time.

Yes, in my opinion what the driver did was wrong. But again I have to say I can find no logical reason for you to be cycling like that. Your cycling didn't cause him to run into you, but neither did your cycling help the situation. You've got to think of your own safety and that of others, and against a few tons of steel..you won't stand a chance. And cycling (or driving) like that often tends to attract drivers like this..

As far as I am aware this driver is still at large.
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
DU05 ZNC 2017-01-23 18:51:33

06:20 onwards. Yet another entitled prat.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
DU05 ZNC 2017-01-23 18:50:29

Is this where he got his license?

http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2017/01/23/driving-test-conmen-jailed-over-2000-impersonation-scam/

..or was it some shit-hole outfit here..

Rate this comment:
+
1
-
DU05 ZNC 2017-01-17 18:45:12

21:42:26 You're saying all bicycles are toys?
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
DU05 ZNC 2017-01-16 21:42:26

Cyclist obviously has a death wish.
Only going to be one outcome when you dick about with 1500kg of metal while ridiing your kids toy ..... camera or not!!
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
DU05 ZNC 2017-01-16 04:13:15

I'll also bet good money on this. Look where it was filmed..much of the community round there is close-nit. We had people come to London from there and they told us first-hand, what it's like. Lots of people know lots of other people and they know what goes on - so he would be known.

So if those people who know things fail to provide details then it is also they who might just have blood on their hands when he runs someone over and takes their life. Driving like that, the chances are high. Not only that, if his insurance, plates, and MOT are all 'non-traceable' then the person he hits won't be able to claim against him (well not easily anyway), and anything that could happen to him in his car he will have an extremely hard time dealing with, including a collision. The driver is unsafe. The car should not be on the road. Do the right thing.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
DU05 ZNC 2017-01-16 04:05:59

Apparently this car is still insured?? What I want to know is, WHAT are the insurers going to do about it?
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
DU05 ZNC 2017-01-16 03:11:25

Yes cyclist was riding like a dick

But that's no excuse to take the law into your own hands
That's no excuse to attempt to cause an accident by dangerous driving
That's no excuse to leave you vehicle in a threatening manner
That's no excuse to cause an accident (deliberately drive your car into the cyclist) and then fail to stop
That's no excuse to drive an untaxed vehicle etc

Scum like this need a minimum of a 5 year ban and forced to retake driving test before being allowed back behind a wheel.

As for the cyclist - stop being a dick and giving other cyclists a bad name
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
DU05 ZNC 2017-01-16 01:20:11

Quote video description: "Published on 6 Jan 2017

21st September 2016 ~ 10:45am. Bearwood Road, incidents occur heading northwards between Wellington and Church Road junctions.

Not visible/obvious from the footage but the driver slows down, indicates left and waves me by before swerving at me as I went to pass.

Police failed to identify driver, plates/insurance details false.

Clearly needs taking off the streets and the roads."
Rate this comment:
+
0
-

Add comment

Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Select files
You agree that you accept our rules

Worst drivers in November

  1. LC06 OPH
  2. KP68 VDV
  3. FN66 JYU
  4. DK55 XAT
  5. RF12 HKU
  6. KT73 ZHX
  7. KV59 YWN
  8. MLP 2010
  9. WG02 NFE
  10. BD54 ELC

View drivers' rankings from previous months »

Do you like us?
or transfer some Bitcoins to 1L9Sd6UhYrugmYzp8Zv4iQtZoLRLdvWHPV