Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
2017-07-13 | 2018-07-12 | ✓ Pass | 167,148 |
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- e.m.l light staying on
|
2016-06-28 | 2017-06-27 | ✓ Pass | 157,284 |
- Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
|
2015-06-27 | 2016-06-26 | ✓ Pass | 146,366 |
- Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- emmisions not tested (rev limiter fitted) no visual smoke
|
2015-06-27 | - | ✗ Fail | 146,366 |
- Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- emmisions not tested (rev limiter fitted) no visual smoke
- Offside Front Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
|
2014-03-24 | 2015-03-24 | ✓ Pass | 133,515 |
- Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
|
2013-03-25 | 2014-03-24 | ✓ Pass | 120,866 |
- Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
|
2013-03-25 | - | ✗ Fail | 120,866 |
- Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- Nearside Front Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
|
2012-02-10 | 2013-02-09 | ✓ Pass | 98,478 |
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
2011-03-23 | 2012-03-22 | ✓ Pass | 68,944 |
- Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
|
2011-03-23 | - | ✗ Fail | 68,944 |
- Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
- Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
- Offside Front Headlamp aim aimed so that it dazzles other road users (1.8.A.1a)
|
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
To be fair a lot of these "red route" schemes are just plain dumb, having been implemented by over-zealous power-mad councils who are more interested in profit than they are safety. They deliberately provide insufficient parking and access because they want people to be fined, and to argue amongst themselves instead of demanding their tax money goes towards fair and sustainable solutions.
In this instance, I do not see the vehicle obstructing the whole footway - there's loads of space left. It could be parked a bit better i.e. not jutting out especially it's rear, but I've seen a lot worse..