Registration plate EF51WKS
Official local mnemonic: Essex
Postal area: Chelmsford
Issued: between september 2001 and february 2002
Blue Renault Clio, manufactured in 2001, first registered on 1 December 2001. Cylinder capacity: 1149cc, CO2 emissions: 139 g/km.
As of 6 May 2017 this vehicle had done 130,276 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 206,500 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 19 April 2017
MOT: No details

MOT history

Test dateExpiry dateResultOdometer reading
2017-05-06- Fail130,276
  • Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
  • Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Nearside Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
  • Offside Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
2016-04-302017-05-26 Pass120,138
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Nearside play in rack knuckle
2015-05-162016-05-26 Pass113,251
2015-05-16- Fail113,251
2014-05-272015-05-26 Pass104,313
  • Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
  • Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
2013-05-202014-05-19 Pass92,637
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2013-05-20- Fail92,637
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2012-02-212013-02-20 Pass84,289
2012-02-21- Fail84,289
2011-03-242012-03-23 Pass81,211
  • Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
2011-03-23- Fail81,211
  • Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
2009-12-182010-12-20 Pass75,037
  • Offside Rear Road wheel with a slightly distorted bead rim (4.2.A.1a)
  • Headlight lenses in poor condition.
2008-12-182009-12-20 Pass69,183
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2008-12-17- Fail69,183
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2007-12-182008-12-20 Pass64,574
2006-12-212007-12-20 Pass57,067

Rate driver

3
28

Comments

EF51 WKS 2017-10-05 18:33:13

EF51 WKS is a stupid thick brain dead cunt who should not be driving on the uks road network it’s not the the lorry drivers fault it’s the cunt of the car drivers fault
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-11 08:30:05

HGV drivers are an utter mess and deserve this kind of thing to happen to them. Yes it's wrong but it is Karma. they drive like absolute assholes on the m60 tailgating and pulling, and for what reason? Because they have a small todge
Rate this comment:
+
6
-
EF51 WKS 2017-09-26 22:35:08

Chaz enjoys violating the rectums of recently-deceased stoats. Just thought I'd point that out.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-18 14:07:53

Chaz, why are you stupid?
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-13 00:59:03

@ Chaz2017-04-12 08:28:56

How is it supposed to be the HGV driver that fucked up and is to blame? How? The oncoming car forced them to make an emergency stop. So when a child runs in the road you're saying it's my fault for trying to avoid killing them, right? The fault here lies with the prat in the black car, forcing their vehicle into oncoming traffic. There's a section in the driving test specifically for this..it's called "emergency stop", and that's all the truck driver did. IF the driver behind them was keeping the required distance and speed then that greatly increases the chance they will be able to stop in time. It's their responsibility to do so.
Rate this comment:
+
4
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-13 00:53:49

Chaz are you on something? None of what you say (apart from it being wrong to over-take there), is in any way applicable to this video. You're accusing all lorry drivers on the basis of something that never happened. It's like saying all black people are muggers because a black suspect was arrested for mugging. Something tells me to ask you if you actually know this to be so, and are just here to piss about?
Rate this comment:
+
3
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-12 14:42:17

The van should have been keeping a safe distance so he will be liable for colliding with the rear of the HGV even though the HGV driver reacted like he had Parkinson's disease. So the insurance of the car or van will have to folk out for any damage. Can't see HGV driver/owner losing out in any way.
Rate this comment:
+
4
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-12 12:13:11

Wrong Chaz & Dave. If, as it seems from the description, the van went into the back of the HGV that he had been behind in the leadup to this then it is the van's fault.
The van went into the back of the HGV because he was too close and could not safely react.
Although the overtaker triggered it all, it can be no part of the claim.
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-12 08:28:56

Not really though mate, The HGV was the one that fucked up, if the van had a dashcam then the HGV driver is fucked, will lose his lcense and be prosecuted.
Rate this comment:
+
3
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-12 03:13:57

The van driver behind crashed into the back of the HGV so the van insurance will pay out for the damage. Hopefully the van drivers insurers will then claim off the dodgy overtaking cars insurance. The car driver may also face charges for dangerous driving in addition to increased insurance premiums. I guess you could call it karma.
Rate this comment:
+
4
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-10 16:24:12

Shocking driving and an a highly exaggerated manouver by the dash cam vehicle, if he could judge spaces properly he would have known he had enough room to carry on as normal instead of swerving like a maniac
Rate this comment:
+
8
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-14 13:14:47

HGV driver must have nearly had a heart attack. He probably wasn't expecting a car to come towards him head-on.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-11 22:04:56

Well said Brian, you explained it perfectly.
Rate this comment:
+
6
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-11 20:04:28

Trolls can bang on about this, that and the other but it doesn't change the fact that the bad driver in this video is the car. You don't overtake when there is traffic coming the opposite direction and there is a solid white line on your side. What more is giver to say?
Rate this comment:
+
5
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-11 19:41:42

I would say that in hindsight, Bob is right: Larry/Sid/Troll has "no idea" and I wouldn't be surprised if in fact it's THEIR comments that have been moderated. Bob is yet another user on this site who has exposed the site troll for wasting time..how many is that now? How many negative votes does the troll need to received before it finally sinks in they're acting like a time-wasting moron who's not wanted here?

Well done Bob for taking a stand. Don't expect reason and maturity from the site troll, however. They've made it clear they don't want to be reasoned with.
Rate this comment:
+
3
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-11 18:22:01

That response means Larry/Sid/James has never driven an HGV and has no idea about such matters.
Rate this comment:
+
4
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-11 08:27:09

Have you? No you're probably 5 mate get to school and dream about shit HGV's with drivers that can't drive.
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-10 21:17:05

Have you ever driven an HGV? Thought not.
Rate this comment:
+
5
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-10 05:14:58

Just listen to the BBC on the radio. Look at how they dealt with an issue in Saudi Arabia regarding women not being allowed to drive. It's like BBC Question Time: they hand-pick the questions and the answers to suit their sordid agenda. Not wonder that bastard Jimmy Saville felt so "at home" there..
Rate this comment:
+
3
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-10 05:18:33

Instead of just saying it is wrong to discriminate against women they instead use it as an excuse to attack British male drivers. Of course, it's an inferred attack, never direct. That's how the BBC rolls. That's what they do. That's why they are despised so much, by so many. They are finding it harder and harder to justify themselves especially in view of recent exposures. Without the BBC, certain factions within Britain's political and economic "elite" are basically screwed. Let it come.
Rate this comment:
+
3
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-09 19:45:48

This car dangerously overtook a truck and crossed a solid white line in the process. This resulted in the HGV dash cam vehicle, which was travelling in the opposite direction, having to take evasive action which resulted in the van behind colliding with the dash cam vehicle. Police notified. Happened on A140 Brome near Eye, Suffolk, not far from the border with Norfolk.
Rate this comment:
+
21
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-13 09:45:18

21:34:38 Nothing of the sort. I only mentioned it seemed a bit of an overreaction. The rest of what I said was critical of the other drivers.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-11 22:07:31

21:34:38 So you're saying the HGV driver put a camera in his cab to just piss about and over-react, risking not only his reputation but also possibly his job? Come off it, sunshine..as mentioned already, the party at fault here is clearly the car crossing the solid white lines.
Rate this comment:
+
3
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-11 19:47:39

I see many cars tail-gating HGV's on a daily basis. Same for cutting in too close, forcing the lorry to perform heavy braking whether it's on an A road or the motorway. I do not see how you can say it's usually HGV's that are responsible; perhaps in your experience but if so then why not state as such? You don't know every HGV driver.
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-11 09:02:10

"it is usually the HGVs that do the tailgating" - in other words you don't usually see a car tailgating an HGV because they perceive the danger.

So no, I am not extrapolating to accuse all HGV drivers. Stop reading your own pathetic agenda into other people's comments.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-11 01:30:58

So James, your hypothesis is based on two registrations out of all the HGV drivers in this country...........
Rate this comment:
+
4
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-10 08:49:41

JG08 JJG and PK62 WPY for a start......
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-10 05:20:46

James, do you have an proof to substantiate your claim that it's usually HGVs that do the tailgating?
Rate this comment:
+
3
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-10 02:40:55

No ones likes ending up stuck behind a lorry for miles and miles on an A road but this was a dangerous and illegal overtake. The driver could see the lorry approaching but still proceeded to overtake, crossing the solid white line. Hope they get prosecuted for this.
Rate this comment:
+
4
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-10 00:17:53

Renault Clio driver was a dick for overtaking when it wasn't safe. End of.
Rate this comment:
+
7
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-09 22:46:23

It does look like an overreaction by the HGV driver but his load may have had something to do with it.
Rate this comment:
+
8
-
EF51 WKS 2017-04-09 21:34:38

Bit of an overreaction by the HGV driver. If the vehicle behind collided they were driving too close. Funnily enough, it is usually the HGVs that do the tailgating!
But yes, EF51 WKS deserved to be towed behind an HGV by a rope tied round his testicles (or whatever else if femail) so I'm voting him/her down.
Rate this comment:
+
8
-

Add comment

Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Select files
You agree that you accept our rules

Worst drivers in December

  1. B16 TAJ
  2. FH56 XPE
  3. PF14 LDD
  4. SR18 HLY
  5. CK59 KWR
  6. AU12 PYB
  7. KP68 VDV
  8. LC06 OPH
  9. YJ22 CWL
  10. ML54 XBT

View drivers' rankings from previous months »

Do you like us?
or transfer some Bitcoins to 1L9Sd6UhYrugmYzp8Zv4iQtZoLRLdvWHPV