Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: Hampshire and Dorset
Postal area: Bournemouth
Issued: between september 2005 and february 2006
Black Nissan Micra, manufactured in 2005, first registered on 1 October 2005. Cylinder capacity: 1240cc, CO2 emissions: 143 g/km.
Official local mnemonic: Hampshire and DorsetPostal area: Bournemouth
Issued: between september 2005 and february 2006
Black Nissan Micra, manufactured in 2005, first registered on 1 October 2005. Cylinder capacity: 1240cc, CO2 emissions: 143 g/km.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 May 2020
✗ No MOT Expired: 30 October 2019
Rate driver
Comments
HG55 MMJ
andy2019-01-25 21:00:59
can you get it now? why is this not in the driving test for gods sake, its the law... highway code rule 163.
can you get it now? why is this not in the driving test for gods sake, its the law... highway code rule 163.
HG55 MMJ
2019-01-28 21:52:07
Seems they'll ban you first, with your trolling attitude..
"They should ban cyclists from public roads,"
- Cyclists are there by legal right; cars by permission.
"they force dangerous manoeuvres into oncoming traffic"
- Are you sniffing glue? You don't know every cyclist. But still, that doesn't stop you trying to discriminate against them on account of your deranged mind..
", and that's just when they are behaving."
- You, are, trolling.
"If you don't like being near motor vehicles, then don't cycle on the bloody roads!"
Typical moron attitude you have there. Roads are for everyone - learn to share them. What you are doing here is hurling a classic "straw man" argument because you cannot deal with this situation on a logical and fair level. You've taken the complaint made on this page and painted a complete fallacy in order to suit your twisted narrative. The FACT is the person making this complaint is NOT atually complaining about being "near motor vehicles" - LEARN to READ the CONTEXT of their message.
If YOU don't like sharing the roads then STAY OFF THEM why don't you or at least until such a time as you grow up, and belt up! You stupid little troll.
Seems they'll ban you first, with your trolling attitude..
"They should ban cyclists from public roads,"
- Cyclists are there by legal right; cars by permission.
"they force dangerous manoeuvres into oncoming traffic"
- Are you sniffing glue? You don't know every cyclist. But still, that doesn't stop you trying to discriminate against them on account of your deranged mind..
", and that's just when they are behaving."
- You, are, trolling.
"If you don't like being near motor vehicles, then don't cycle on the bloody roads!"
Typical moron attitude you have there. Roads are for everyone - learn to share them. What you are doing here is hurling a classic "straw man" argument because you cannot deal with this situation on a logical and fair level. You've taken the complaint made on this page and painted a complete fallacy in order to suit your twisted narrative. The FACT is the person making this complaint is NOT atually complaining about being "near motor vehicles" - LEARN to READ the CONTEXT of their message.
If YOU don't like sharing the roads then STAY OFF THEM why don't you or at least until such a time as you grow up, and belt up! You stupid little troll.
HG55 MMJ
someone2019-01-27 10:37:28
They should ban cyclists from public roads, they force dangerous manoeuvres into oncoming traffic, and that's just when they are behaving. If you don't like being near motor vehicles, then don't cycle on the bloody roads!
They should ban cyclists from public roads, they force dangerous manoeuvres into oncoming traffic, and that's just when they are behaving. If you don't like being near motor vehicles, then don't cycle on the bloody roads!
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
That's crazy. To my knowledge they need to give you at LEAST as much space as a car which is 1.0 meters if you're doing less than 15 mph and 1.5 meters if higher. Of course, that's the minimum and not a target. This distance is more important than being in the next lane, as lane width varies. But obviously the more room they can give the better and it is always appreciated.
Unfortunately there is a reason so many get away with it - it's not law. There's no actual legal binding for minimum passing distances - the only thing the police can do them for is dangerous/reckless/careless driving. So in many cases, basically anything goes as long as they aren't seen doing it. Worse, many forces won't act on footage and/or witness testimony because as with complaints from other car drivers they basically can't be bothered and they want to keep crime down any way they can..
In my personal experience most car drivers are OK. We are all equals even though cyclists are there by legal right, cars by legal permission. It's that minority of pricks in cars and on bikes that make life problematic for the rest of us. I hope the driver in this incident can see the danger in what they did and I really hope they are not doing it in purpose.