Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: Hampshire and Dorset
Postal area: Portsmouth
Issued: between september 2001 and february 2002
Blue Land rover Discovery, manufactured in 2006, first registered on 1 November 2006. Cylinder capacity: 2720cc, CO2 emissions: 270 g/km.
As of 24 June 2017 this vehicle had done 134,798 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 585,400 miles.
Official local mnemonic: Hampshire and DorsetPostal area: Portsmouth
Issued: between september 2001 and february 2002
Blue Land rover Discovery, manufactured in 2006, first registered on 1 November 2006. Cylinder capacity: 2720cc, CO2 emissions: 270 g/km.
As of 24 June 2017 this vehicle had done 134,798 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 585,400 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 July 2018
✗ No MOT Expired: 23 June 2018
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-24 | 2018-06-23 | ✓ Pass | 134,798 |
| 2017-05-02 | 2018-05-14 | ✓ Pass | 134,069 |
| |||
| 2017-04-28 | - | ✗ Fail | 134,030 |
| |||
| 2016-09-16 | 2017-09-20 | ✓ Pass | 88,026 |
| 2016-09-16 | - | ✗ Fail | 88,026 |
| 2016-04-22 | 2017-05-14 | ✓ Pass | 114,513 |
| |||
| 2016-04-21 | - | ✗ Fail | 124,184 |
| |||
| 2015-08-26 | 2016-09-20 | ✓ Pass | 56,744 |
| 2015-04-30 | 2016-05-14 | ✓ Pass | 114,513 |
| |||
| 2015-04-30 | - | ✗ Fail | 114,513 |
| |||
| 2014-05-15 | 2015-05-14 | ✓ Pass | 105,453 |
| |||
| 2014-05-14 | - | ✗ Fail | 105,453 |
| |||
| 2013-05-14 | 2014-05-13 | ✓ Pass | 92,805 |
| 2012-06-25 | 2013-06-29 | ✓ Pass | 84,849 |
| |||
| 2012-06-25 | - | ✗ Fail | 84,842 |
| |||
| 2011-06-30 | 2012-06-29 | ✓ Pass | 73,568 |
| |||
| 2011-06-29 | - | ✗ Fail | 73,563 |
| |||
| 2010-12-20 | 2011-12-19 | ✓ Pass | 70,679 |
| |||
| 2010-12-20 | - | ✗ Fail | 70,679 |
| |||
| 2009-11-30 | 2010-11-29 | ✓ Pass | 53,415 |
| |||
Rate driver
Comments
HY51 HAY
Billy2017-11-27 11:35:51
Forgive me, but it seems he was driving slowly because there was a huge lorry in front of him...? Also, bit hypocritical seeing as you then proceed to break the speed limit by 7mph.
Forgive me, but it seems he was driving slowly because there was a huge lorry in front of him...? Also, bit hypocritical seeing as you then proceed to break the speed limit by 7mph.
HY51 HAY
Billy2017-12-05 15:34:51
Dave. That is a guideline only. The speed limit is still 60, therefore the law is being broken.
"The truth is that the “10% plus 2” rule isn’t actually a rule at all: it is merely a guideline. The ‘rule’ originates from speed enforcement guidance issued by the Association of Chief Police Officers[1] which sets out the strategy that police forces should use when enforcing speed limits."
Dave. That is a guideline only. The speed limit is still 60, therefore the law is being broken.
"The truth is that the “10% plus 2” rule isn’t actually a rule at all: it is merely a guideline. The ‘rule’ originates from speed enforcement guidance issued by the Association of Chief Police Officers[1] which sets out the strategy that police forces should use when enforcing speed limits."
HY51 HAY
Dave2017-12-05 09:36:42
By 7mph? UK laws state you are allowed to go at the designated road speed +10% +2mph which for this road would be 68 before any law is broken. If you watch the speed carefully, the driver safely overtakes then reduces speed once past the vehicle.
By 7mph? UK laws state you are allowed to go at the designated road speed +10% +2mph which for this road would be 68 before any law is broken. If you watch the speed carefully, the driver safely overtakes then reduces speed once past the vehicle.
HY51 HAY
Billy2017-11-30 08:29:08
I hear you. The problem is always the same though. We never get to see what happened a minute or two before the video starts.
I hear you. The problem is always the same though. We never get to see what happened a minute or two before the video starts.
HY51 HAY
2017-11-29 12:54:35
It wasn't the driving slowly that was the problem (besides, when it's safe to overtake, it's safer doing so than just sitting behind, because otherwise you just leave more of an obstruction to other road users behind you).
It's the completely unnecessary braking and then pulling a massively risky stunt that put the OP and the other cars in danger that's the problem. Going 7mph over the limit is peanuts compared with driving like an absolute psychopath.
It wasn't the driving slowly that was the problem (besides, when it's safe to overtake, it's safer doing so than just sitting behind, because otherwise you just leave more of an obstruction to other road users behind you).
It's the completely unnecessary braking and then pulling a massively risky stunt that put the OP and the other cars in danger that's the problem. Going 7mph over the limit is peanuts compared with driving like an absolute psychopath.
HY51 HAY
Billy2017-11-29 08:50:09
Lol... someone presents a valid argument and all you are able to do is resort to playground namecalling. How fucking pathetic.
Lol... someone presents a valid argument and all you are able to do is resort to playground namecalling. How fucking pathetic.
HY51 HAY
2017-11-26 21:50:17
Shouldn't have braked. Should have just gone into back of the thick cunt
Shouldn't have braked. Should have just gone into back of the thick cunt
HY51 HAY
.2017-11-25 12:39:26
Just another braindead cunt in some high-mileage 4x4 that's probably had countless owners before him. Obviously thinks he's the bees bollocks, probably a pikey judging by the state of him.
Just another braindead cunt in some high-mileage 4x4 that's probably had countless owners before him. Obviously thinks he's the bees bollocks, probably a pikey judging by the state of him.
HY51 HAY
2017-11-25 12:47:39
True that. That car has about 140k on the clock and 4 owners in total.
Neither the driver or the car has seen any water in the past 10 years.
True that. That car has about 140k on the clock and 4 owners in total.
Neither the driver or the car has seen any water in the past 10 years.
HY51 HAY
2017-11-23 21:22:15
Go ahead and report it to the police if you think this video shows ALL the incident. Just remember they will want to see the video prior to this.
Go ahead and report it to the police if you think this video shows ALL the incident. Just remember they will want to see the video prior to this.
HY51 HAY
2017-11-29 12:50:32
That's completely irrelevant. Sure, if there's something the person filming did first, they both lose their licenses. Either way, the 4x4 driver is going down. There is no excuse for such irresponsible driving, doesn't matter what provoked it whatsoever - the 4x4 driver endangered the life of the person filming AND the people in the 4 cars passing in the other direction.
That's completely irrelevant. Sure, if there's something the person filming did first, they both lose their licenses. Either way, the 4x4 driver is going down. There is no excuse for such irresponsible driving, doesn't matter what provoked it whatsoever - the 4x4 driver endangered the life of the person filming AND the people in the 4 cars passing in the other direction.
HY51 HAY
2017-11-22 05:35:35
Please upload 2 mins prior to the start of this incident. Also please update us on any proceedings.
Please upload 2 mins prior to the start of this incident. Also please update us on any proceedings.
HY51 HAY
Cunt2017-11-21 18:05:52
Please say you reported this Indbred cunt to the police? If not please do so!! Man idve loved to knock out what teeth that prick had remaining
Please say you reported this Indbred cunt to the police? If not please do so!! Man idve loved to knock out what teeth that prick had remaining
HY51 HAY
RoadSafeGB2017-11-21 15:36:02
Stone me !!! If the moron had nudged you when he was undertaking you he would have sent you in to oncoming traffic. What a d***head.
Surely he can be done for dangerous driving? Have you reported the idiot to the police?
Stone me !!! If the moron had nudged you when he was undertaking you he would have sent you in to oncoming traffic. What a d***head.
Surely he can be done for dangerous driving? Have you reported the idiot to the police?
HY51 HAY
DarrenF2017-11-21 12:38:56
Whilst driving to work, I was stuck behind a slow moving vehicle on a 60MPH road. So I kept over to the right of the road and at a safe distance from the driver in front. This must have annoyed him as he randomly hits the brakes so hard you can see the front of his car drop. When the road is clear, I safely overtake him and ignore the fingers and swerving into the side of my car.
That's not the end though, because this idiot then decides to undertake me and nearly ends up in the back of the horse box. I've encountered my fair share of morons on the road, but this one has some serious anger management issues.
Whilst driving to work, I was stuck behind a slow moving vehicle on a 60MPH road. So I kept over to the right of the road and at a safe distance from the driver in front. This must have annoyed him as he randomly hits the brakes so hard you can see the front of his car drop. When the road is clear, I safely overtake him and ignore the fingers and swerving into the side of my car.
That's not the end though, because this idiot then decides to undertake me and nearly ends up in the back of the horse box. I've encountered my fair share of morons on the road, but this one has some serious anger management issues.
HY51 HAY
CityandFarmCommuter2017-12-01 12:09:46
Tailgating? I could a two-second gap at the start. Then the vehicle in front decides to play around with their brakes. The reduced gap is almost entirely due to the vehicle in front.
As they're over-taken you can the car in front has no obstruction and is weaving around due to the driver not having control and thus weaving around like a mad-man.
The dash-cam driver didn't end up stuck being the other keep..the other jeep did a reckless, dangerous under-take; this with oncoming traffic traveling at significant speed.
Whatever you complaint, it in no way justifies the actions of the jeep driver who was basically a prick out to cause injury or death. I doubt very much the police and the courts would give your outburst much consideration, either. Oh but apparently you think this makes the dash-cam driver a snob..my God, are you THAT deluded? Or just a shit driver? Maybe you are the jeep still wanting to throw their rattle out the pram. Well, grow up.
Tailgating? I could a two-second gap at the start. Then the vehicle in front decides to play around with their brakes. The reduced gap is almost entirely due to the vehicle in front.
As they're over-taken you can the car in front has no obstruction and is weaving around due to the driver not having control and thus weaving around like a mad-man.
The dash-cam driver didn't end up stuck being the other keep..the other jeep did a reckless, dangerous under-take; this with oncoming traffic traveling at significant speed.
Whatever you complaint, it in no way justifies the actions of the jeep driver who was basically a prick out to cause injury or death. I doubt very much the police and the courts would give your outburst much consideration, either. Oh but apparently you think this makes the dash-cam driver a snob..my God, are you THAT deluded? Or just a shit driver? Maybe you are the jeep still wanting to throw their rattle out the pram. Well, grow up.
HY51 HAY
2017-12-01 00:54:37
-You tailgated
-You overtook on a 60mph in a horse box
-You ended up stuck behind the van the other jeep was stuck behind.
You equine snobs do my head in. You are not the royal family.
-You tailgated
-You overtook on a 60mph in a horse box
-You ended up stuck behind the van the other jeep was stuck behind.
You equine snobs do my head in. You are not the royal family.
HY51 HAY
.2017-11-24 11:39:45
Apparently the car's original plate was DA56 ADU.
Go down to your local police station and report that d*ckhead.
Apparently the car's original plate was DA56 ADU.
Go down to your local police station and report that d*ckhead.
HY51 HAY
Igman2017-11-22 21:18:46
Two fuckwits trying to eliminate each other. Good fun, shame they both failed.
Two fuckwits trying to eliminate each other. Good fun, shame they both failed.
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
sorry OP, whilst the undertaking was dangerous, you were complicit in tailgating him to begin with.