Registration plate KR13XKE
Official local mnemonic: Milton Keynes
Postal area: Northampton
Issued: between march 2013 and august 2013
White Toyota Iq, manufactured in 2013, first registered on 1 June 2013. Cylinder capacity: 998cc, CO2 emissions: 110 g/km.
As of 31 May 2018 this vehicle had done 48,993 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 115,600 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 June 2020
✗ No MOT Expired: 3 June 2020

MOT history

Test dateExpiry dateResultOdometer reading
2018-05-312019-06-03 Pass48,993
2018-05-30- Fail48,993
2017-05-252018-06-03 Pass38,641
  • under trays /engine covers fitted
  • Nearside Front tyre outer wall cut/no cord
  • Front registration plate delaminated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
  • Offside Rear bumper damage
  • Nearside Front repeater lamp damage
  • rear belts/buckles not tested at time of inspection/loaded
2017-05-22- Fail38,641
  • under trays /engine covers fitted
  • Nearside Front tyre outer wall cut/no cord
  • Front registration plate delaminated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
  • Offside Rear bumper damage
  • Nearside Front repeater lamp damage
  • rear belts/buckles not tested at time of inspection/loaded
2016-06-022017-06-03 Pass27,960
  • nearside Side repeater damaged, but still visible from a reasonable distance (1.4.A.2e)

Rate driver

0
7

Comments

KR13 XKE 2016-01-09 04:37:35

It's not one rule for us and a separate rule for them.

Council needs to publicly apologise and ensure it doesn't happen again.

http://pedestrianliberation.org/2010/08/30/are-vehicles-allowed-to-park-on-the-pavement/
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
KR13 XKE 2015-12-12 16:40:14

I gave the driver a thumbs down but I understand that these vehicles that are normally operated by local authorities or their contractors are permitted to do this although unfair, best to report it to your local Council and Councillor if you feel aggrieved.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
KR13 XKE 2015-12-12 00:31:28

This is actually a CCTV Enforcement car, that was parked on the pavement and over a single yellow line in times of operation, causing an obstruction, yet they continue to issue fines to unsuspecting motorists who may not know the area or when moving, have not seen the signs because they are either obstructed, absent or cluttered with other roadsigns!! What gives them the right to break the law as well?
Rate this comment:
+
1
-

Add comment

Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Select files
You agree that you accept our rules

Worst drivers in December

  1. FH56 XPE
  2. SR18 HLY
  3. PF14 LDD
  4. CK59 KWR
  5. B16 TAJ
  6. KP68 VDV
  7. LC06 OPH
  8. SC17 XDH
  9. AU12 PYB
  10. YJ22 CWL

View drivers' rankings from previous months »

Do you like us?
or transfer some Bitcoins to 1L9Sd6UhYrugmYzp8Zv4iQtZoLRLdvWHPV