Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: Milton Keynes
Postal area: Northampton
Issued: between september 2004 and february 2005
Silver Mercedes C 180k, manufactured in 2004, first registered on 1 December 2004. Cylinder capacity: 1796cc, CO2 emissions: 203 g/km.
As of 2 May 2018 this vehicle had done 138,845 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 199,500 miles.
Official local mnemonic: Milton KeynesPostal area: Northampton
Issued: between september 2004 and february 2005
Silver Mercedes C 180k, manufactured in 2004, first registered on 1 December 2004. Cylinder capacity: 1796cc, CO2 emissions: 203 g/km.
As of 2 May 2018 this vehicle had done 138,845 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 199,500 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 May 2020
✗ No MOT Expired: 1 May 2020
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-24 | 2018-04-24 | ✓ Pass | 129,426 |
| 2016-04-25 | 2017-04-24 | ✓ Pass | 120,367 |
| |||
| 2015-03-30 | 2016-03-31 | ✓ Pass | 110,927 |
| 2015-03-30 | - | ✗ Fail | 110,927 |
| 2014-04-01 | 2015-03-31 | ✓ Pass | 104,349 |
| |||
| 2014-03-21 | - | ✗ Fail | 104,160 |
| |||
| 2013-02-22 | 2014-03-10 | ✓ Pass | 95,192 |
| |||
| 2012-03-07 | 2013-03-10 | ✓ Pass | 86,072 |
| |||
| 2011-03-11 | 2012-03-10 | ✓ Pass | 77,846 |
| |||
| 2011-03-08 | - | ✗ Fail | 77,823 |
| |||
| 2010-02-22 | 2011-02-21 | ✓ Pass | 69,939 |
| |||
| 2009-01-07 | 2010-01-06 | ✓ Pass | 58,610 |
| 2009-01-07 | - | ✗ Fail | 58,610 |
| 2008-01-04 | 2009-01-03 | ✓ Pass | 42,952 |
Rate driver
Comments
KR54 NHO
2016-10-28 02:06:48
See the down-voting club (Sid James' proxy?!) has been busy. Oh, and the classic giveaway: no comments, just down votes.. a fire-and-forget policy. Haterz gonna hate, and trolls gonna troll. Maybe they're hissing mad like a snake named Sid, for being banned off You Tube for their abuse! ;)))
See the down-voting club (Sid James' proxy?!) has been busy. Oh, and the classic giveaway: no comments, just down votes.. a fire-and-forget policy. Haterz gonna hate, and trolls gonna troll. Maybe they're hissing mad like a snake named Sid, for being banned off You Tube for their abuse! ;)))
KR54 NHO
2016-10-27 13:33:17
$hit job of road positioning by the cyclist beforehand.
At least the car driver is indicating and making his intentions known, at what point was the cylcist going to signal??
$hit job of road positioning by the cyclist beforehand.
At least the car driver is indicating and making his intentions known, at what point was the cylcist going to signal??
KR54 NHO
2016-10-28 18:34:44
You do not over-take through pedestrian islands. You do not over-take at junctions. As mentioned you give cyclists room. Even if the cyclist was going left, it still wouldn't be safe or legal to over-take. Some of your haters really are fucked in the head..
You do not over-take through pedestrian islands. You do not over-take at junctions. As mentioned you give cyclists room. Even if the cyclist was going left, it still wouldn't be safe or legal to over-take. Some of your haters really are fucked in the head..
KR54 NHO
2016-10-28 18:32:57
What are you talking about? "$hit job of road positioning by the cyclist beforehand." The cyclist was doing nothing wrong. You do not over-take through pedestrian islands. Plain and simple and irrespective of whether you're indicating. Have you actually passed a test? That attitude would certainly fail you on one..
What are you talking about? "$hit job of road positioning by the cyclist beforehand." The cyclist was doing nothing wrong. You do not over-take through pedestrian islands. Plain and simple and irrespective of whether you're indicating. Have you actually passed a test? That attitude would certainly fail you on one..
KR54 NHO
.2016-10-28 02:09:57
Would YOU do this to a car? Then you don't do it to a bike - you give the bike at LEAST as much room as you would a car. The driver here is entirely at fault.
Would YOU do this to a car? Then you don't do it to a bike - you give the bike at LEAST as much room as you would a car. The driver here is entirely at fault.
KR54 NHO
2016-10-28 02:08:24
Here it is in PLAIN English: Do NOT over-take on a junction. Give cyclists room.
Here it is in PLAIN English: Do NOT over-take on a junction. Give cyclists room.
KR54 NHO
2016-10-28 02:03:44
You're just trying to blame the victim. The fact is, REGARDLESS of the cyclist's position or signaling, the driver should NOT - NOT - be over-taking there. Is that so HARD for you to comprehend? And an indicator is ONLY a declaration of intent; it's not an automatic right. Don't just take my word for it - check your copy of the Highway Code.
You're just trying to blame the victim. The fact is, REGARDLESS of the cyclist's position or signaling, the driver should NOT - NOT - be over-taking there. Is that so HARD for you to comprehend? And an indicator is ONLY a declaration of intent; it's not an automatic right. Don't just take my word for it - check your copy of the Highway Code.
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
As long as the cyclist was unhurt, it's a pity contact wasn't made. I say that because that driver needs prosecuting.