Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: London
Postal area: Borehamwood
Issued: between september 2003 and february 2004
Silver Vauxhall Signum, manufactured in 2004, first registered on 1 January 2004. Cylinder capacity: 2198cc, CO2 emissions: 211 g/km.
As of 10 January 2017 this vehicle had done 84,063 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 144,700 miles.
Official local mnemonic: LondonPostal area: Borehamwood
Issued: between september 2003 and february 2004
Silver Vauxhall Signum, manufactured in 2004, first registered on 1 January 2004. Cylinder capacity: 2198cc, CO2 emissions: 211 g/km.
As of 10 January 2017 this vehicle had done 84,063 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 144,700 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 April 2018
✗ No MOT Expired: 3 February 2018
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-10 | 2018-02-03 | ✓ Pass | 84,063 |
| |||
| 2017-01-10 | - | ✗ Fail | 84,063 |
| |||
| 2016-02-04 | 2017-02-03 | ✓ Pass | 76,863 |
| 2015-03-24 | 2016-03-23 | ✓ Pass | 71,706 |
| |||
| 2015-03-20 | - | ✗ Fail | 71,706 |
| |||
| 2014-01-27 | 2015-01-30 | ✓ Pass | 57,120 |
| |||
| 2013-01-29 | 2014-01-30 | ✓ Pass | 55,373 |
| |||
| 2012-01-31 | 2013-01-30 | ✓ Pass | 53,776 |
| 2012-01-30 | - | ✗ Fail | 53,774 |
| 2011-01-26 | 2012-01-29 | ✓ Pass | 51,570 |
| |||
| 2010-01-22 | 2011-01-29 | ✓ Pass | 48,543 |
| |||
| 2010-01-22 | - | ✗ Fail | 48,543 |
| |||
| 2009-01-22 | 2010-01-29 | ✓ Pass | 40,538 |
| 2008-01-14 | 2009-01-29 | ✓ Pass | 33,749 |
| 2007-01-24 | 2008-01-29 | ✓ Pass | 26,377 |
Rate driver
Comments
LS53 USU
Stinger2016-05-26 12:32:45
All the cocks in the house shout yo! Or wave out the window, totally disagree with this comment, the guy in the Vauxhall is just a cunt who thinks he owns the road, nuff said.
All the cocks in the house shout yo! Or wave out the window, totally disagree with this comment, the guy in the Vauxhall is just a cunt who thinks he owns the road, nuff said.
LS53 USU
Malc2016-05-26 07:52:47
That's rubbish Skribjohn, as N59 says, there was a safe distance between the camera car and the Nissan but the gap for the Vauxhall closed as the Nissan pulled further ahead of the Audi and the gap went with it. It was a dangerous manoeuvre, and as they were in the inside lane, they should have yielded until there was a space to pull out. If the camera car would have hit the Vauxhall, there's not a court in the land that wouldn't say they were at fault. Although as you know the road, is it possible that this is your car? If so I understand the comment more, but it's still BS.
That's rubbish Skribjohn, as N59 says, there was a safe distance between the camera car and the Nissan but the gap for the Vauxhall closed as the Nissan pulled further ahead of the Audi and the gap went with it. It was a dangerous manoeuvre, and as they were in the inside lane, they should have yielded until there was a space to pull out. If the camera car would have hit the Vauxhall, there's not a court in the land that wouldn't say they were at fault. Although as you know the road, is it possible that this is your car? If so I understand the comment more, but it's still BS.
LS53 USU
N592016-05-26 06:10:10
Although whilst possibly true the camera could have let off the gas to build a bigger gap, the camera car was keeping a safe distance from the Nissan in front (2 seconds).
The car in question changing lanes should have not forced the camera car to change speed or direction because of his actions which is what clearly happened.
I would not describe the camera car as "hogging the outside lane" at any point either.
Although whilst possibly true the camera could have let off the gas to build a bigger gap, the camera car was keeping a safe distance from the Nissan in front (2 seconds).
The car in question changing lanes should have not forced the camera car to change speed or direction because of his actions which is what clearly happened.
I would not describe the camera car as "hogging the outside lane" at any point either.
LS53 USU
Dan2016-05-25 08:03:42
This guy cut in dangerously nearly causing an accident. He then lets go of the wheel to give a nice wave to the camera, his passenger was less polite.
I also noticed the 'Baby on board' sign in the back, I hope their parenting skills are better than their driving, or poor kid's got no chance.
This guy cut in dangerously nearly causing an accident. He then lets go of the wheel to give a nice wave to the camera, his passenger was less polite.
I also noticed the 'Baby on board' sign in the back, I hope their parenting skills are better than their driving, or poor kid's got no chance.
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Knowing that bit of road and seeing the Vauxhall indicated to come out my analysis is that you were deliberately driving to prevent a lane change. Why? We've alk got to be somewhere. Trouble is discourteous drivers hogging the outside lane.