Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: London
Postal area: Borehamwood
Issued: between march 2008 and august 2008
White Vauxhall Astra, manufactured in 2008, first registered on 1 May 2008. Cylinder capacity: 1248cc, CO2 emissions: 130 g/km.
As of 3 April 2018 this vehicle had done 159,624 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 217,700 miles.
Official local mnemonic: LondonPostal area: Borehamwood
Issued: between march 2008 and august 2008
White Vauxhall Astra, manufactured in 2008, first registered on 1 May 2008. Cylinder capacity: 1248cc, CO2 emissions: 130 g/km.
As of 3 April 2018 this vehicle had done 159,624 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 217,700 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 June 2019
✗ No MOT Expired: 25 April 2019
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-03 | 2019-04-25 | ✓ Pass | 159,624 |
| |||
| 2017-04-26 | 2018-04-25 | ✓ Pass | 151,430 |
| 2016-04-25 | 2017-04-24 | ✓ Pass | 138,259 |
| 2015-04-24 | 2016-04-24 | ✓ Pass | 118,254 |
| |||
| 2014-04-25 | 2015-04-24 | ✓ Pass | 107,125 |
| 2014-04-25 | - | ✗ Fail | 107,125 |
| 2013-03-11 | 2014-03-14 | ✓ Pass | 89,454 |
| 2012-03-15 | 2013-03-14 | ✓ Pass | 69,734 |
| 2012-03-15 | - | ✗ Fail | 69,734 |
| 2011-04-26 | 2012-04-25 | ✓ Pass | 39,726 |
Rate driver
Comments
LT08 OBF
Taz2016-05-09 15:51:18
I agree, I think , is just trolling. Sure AA used strong language, but it was in context and clearly directed at someone putting lives at risk. It's true.. some people only understand one language. Plus, this , man/woman/whatever seems to have completely bypassed the fact that AA substantiated their post with correct references to the Highway Code. Yet you call all that "rambling"? You have troll written all over you and I wouldn't be surprised if in reality you're the driver or an associate.. or even the person who still might be pissed over having their post taking the mick out of disabled children deleted. Why don't you direct your energies towards the person accused of doing wrong instead of attack people for rightly complaining about their actions? Prove you're not a trouble-maker.
I agree, I think , is just trolling. Sure AA used strong language, but it was in context and clearly directed at someone putting lives at risk. It's true.. some people only understand one language. Plus, this , man/woman/whatever seems to have completely bypassed the fact that AA substantiated their post with correct references to the Highway Code. Yet you call all that "rambling"? You have troll written all over you and I wouldn't be surprised if in reality you're the driver or an associate.. or even the person who still might be pissed over having their post taking the mick out of disabled children deleted. Why don't you direct your energies towards the person accused of doing wrong instead of attack people for rightly complaining about their actions? Prove you're not a trouble-maker.
LT08 OBF
Anon2016-05-08 00:10:16
Hey everyone, looks like the resident troll (aka a variant of ","), is in the house. Hmm, I wonder if you're related to the driver. Your methods read like a book: you don't focus on the issue at hand - the complaint against the driver - instead, all you do is target your energies (you must have a lonely existence), onto what you perceive as unsuspecting victims. Some of us however are wise to your nefarious affairs, including your ad hominem attacks.. funny how you completely bypass the rules cited by AA isn't it.
It's obvious you're only here to stir the pot and cause trouble (again). Fuck off and get a life, troll!
Hey everyone, looks like the resident troll (aka a variant of ","), is in the house. Hmm, I wonder if you're related to the driver. Your methods read like a book: you don't focus on the issue at hand - the complaint against the driver - instead, all you do is target your energies (you must have a lonely existence), onto what you perceive as unsuspecting victims. Some of us however are wise to your nefarious affairs, including your ad hominem attacks.. funny how you completely bypass the rules cited by AA isn't it.
It's obvious you're only here to stir the pot and cause trouble (again). Fuck off and get a life, troll!
LT08 OBF
2016-05-07 07:38:13
Yes however anonymous gets his point across in a clear concise and adult way .
You however just make yourself appear unintelligent and unable to create a post without sounding like some adolescent trying to sound tough . Do you think your post has more impact due to the foul language and rambling nature ?
Yes however anonymous gets his point across in a clear concise and adult way .
You however just make yourself appear unintelligent and unable to create a post without sounding like some adolescent trying to sound tough . Do you think your post has more impact due to the foul language and rambling nature ?
LT08 OBF
AA2016-05-07 01:55:18
p.s. I can you're wondering what Rule 161 is? It's called don't be a cunt all your life, especially if your registration is LT08 OBF. Oh, and that garage and the areas around it also have CCTV.. off you go.
p.s. I can you're wondering what Rule 161 is? It's called don't be a cunt all your life, especially if your registration is LT08 OBF. Oh, and that garage and the areas around it also have CCTV.. off you go.
LT08 OBF
AA2016-05-07 01:54:02
Rule 63:
Rule 63
'Cycle Lanes. These are marked by a white line (which may be broken) along the carriageway (see Rule 140). When using a cycle lane, keep within the lane when practicable. When leaving a cycle lane check before pulling out that it is safe to do so and signal your intention clearly to other road users. Use of cycle lanes is not compulsory and will depend on your experience and skills, but they can make your journey safer.'
Rule 63:
Rule 63
'Cycle Lanes. These are marked by a white line (which may be broken) along the carriageway (see Rule 140). When using a cycle lane, keep within the lane when practicable. When leaving a cycle lane check before pulling out that it is safe to do so and signal your intention clearly to other road users. Use of cycle lanes is not compulsory and will depend on your experience and skills, but they can make your journey safer.'
LT08 OBF
AA2016-05-07 01:52:44
Rule 161:
Rule 61
'Cycle Routes and Other Facilities. Use cycle routes, advanced stop lines, cycle boxes and toucan crossings unless at the time it is unsafe to do so. Use of these facilities is not compulsory and will depend on your experience and skills, but they can make your journey safer.'
Did you READ that? More importantly, do you UNDERSTAND it? Now apologize and piss off. Fuck you, and every other ignorant cockwomble. Cycle-hating fucker.
Rule 161:
Rule 61
'Cycle Routes and Other Facilities. Use cycle routes, advanced stop lines, cycle boxes and toucan crossings unless at the time it is unsafe to do so. Use of these facilities is not compulsory and will depend on your experience and skills, but they can make your journey safer.'
Did you READ that? More importantly, do you UNDERSTAND it? Now apologize and piss off. Fuck you, and every other ignorant cockwomble. Cycle-hating fucker.
LT08 OBF
Anonymous2016-05-06 23:56:55
As the light turned green, I set off and a second later this driver decided to honk at me, he then hurled down his window to tell me to "get in the bike lane". Only for the driver to turn off into a petrol station about 100 yards down the road. (Yeah it was tempting to pull in too, but common sense told me not to!)
What was the point in all that? What did you benefit? About 2 seconds, and if you're willing to put a cyclist in danger over getting there two seconds faster, then it does really show how ignorant you are.
And if you want to know, I did not use the bike lane as it was a turn lane as well and I did not want to risk being left hooked by a car, the cycle lane in question is poorly thought out. And besides, there is no law requiring me to use cycle lanes. I am entitled to use the road, just like everyone else. Please learn to have some patience, and share the road!
As the light turned green, I set off and a second later this driver decided to honk at me, he then hurled down his window to tell me to "get in the bike lane". Only for the driver to turn off into a petrol station about 100 yards down the road. (Yeah it was tempting to pull in too, but common sense told me not to!)
What was the point in all that? What did you benefit? About 2 seconds, and if you're willing to put a cyclist in danger over getting there two seconds faster, then it does really show how ignorant you are.
And if you want to know, I did not use the bike lane as it was a turn lane as well and I did not want to risk being left hooked by a car, the cycle lane in question is poorly thought out. And besides, there is no law requiring me to use cycle lanes. I am entitled to use the road, just like everyone else. Please learn to have some patience, and share the road!
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Great post. Hey LT08 OBF I lack the manners and the self control of anonymous, so I'm gonna put it to you in your own language: READ THE FUCKING HIGHWAY CODE, YOU SELFISH, DANGEROUS PRICK!! You SHOULD not to harass cyclists, including honking and yelling - did you fucking pass a test? Don't try and excuse yourself. If you read the code and passed a test you would know - as stated by anonymous - that in this country cycle lane use is NOT.. I repeat (since you're obviously thick as shit).. NOT compulsory. Shove your "orders" up your cunt - learn to drive.