Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: Manchester and Merseyside
Postal area: Manchester
Issued: between september 2003 and february 2004
Black Ford Fiesta, manufactured in 2003, first registered on 1 September 2003. Cylinder capacity: 1388cc, CO2 emissions: 158 g/km.
As of 30 January 2017 this vehicle had done 128,067 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 193,500 miles.
Official local mnemonic: Manchester and MerseysidePostal area: Manchester
Issued: between september 2003 and february 2004
Black Ford Fiesta, manufactured in 2003, first registered on 1 September 2003. Cylinder capacity: 1388cc, CO2 emissions: 158 g/km.
As of 30 January 2017 this vehicle had done 128,067 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 193,500 miles.
SORN
✗ No MOT Expired: 29 January 2018
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-30 | 2018-01-29 | ✓ Pass | 128,067 |
| |||
| 2017-01-30 | - | ✗ Fail | 128,067 |
| |||
| 2015-10-09 | 2016-10-16 | ✓ Pass | 116,430 |
| |||
| 2014-10-17 | 2015-10-16 | ✓ Pass | 108,836 |
| |||
| 2014-10-13 | - | ✗ Fail | 108,677 |
| |||
| 2013-10-16 | 2014-10-15 | ✓ Pass | 95,023 |
| |||
| 2013-10-14 | - | ✗ Fail | 95,023 |
| |||
| 2012-09-27 | 2013-10-15 | ✓ Pass | 72,540 |
| 2012-09-27 | - | ✗ Fail | 72,450 |
| |||
| 2011-09-19 | 2012-10-15 | ✓ Pass | 54,290 |
| 2011-09-19 | - | ✗ Fail | 54,274 |
| |||
| 2010-09-17 | 2011-10-15 | ✓ Pass | 33,909 |
| 2009-10-16 | 2010-10-15 | ✓ Pass | 30,705 |
| |||
| 2009-10-16 | - | ✗ Fail | 30,705 |
| |||
Rate driver
Comments
MK53 HCH
Sid James II (or III)2017-03-14 21:09:12
She's clearly in the tunnel BEFORE you get to the sign.
Unless of course your footage proves otherwise? I doubt it though, that's why it's not being posted.
She's clearly in the tunnel BEFORE you get to the sign.
Unless of course your footage proves otherwise? I doubt it though, that's why it's not being posted.
MK53 HCH
No I'm James2017-03-14 20:51:05
Are these the same adults who are calling the woman driving the car a stupid slut and arrogant piece of shit? If the adult in question can't upload the footage to youtube I suggest they find a grown up and get them to do it on their behalf.
Are these the same adults who are calling the woman driving the car a stupid slut and arrogant piece of shit? If the adult in question can't upload the footage to youtube I suggest they find a grown up and get them to do it on their behalf.
MK53 HCH
2017-03-14 19:24:59
Someone provide footage for heaven's sake. This is turning into Tunnel-Gate 2017.
Someone provide footage for heaven's sake. This is turning into Tunnel-Gate 2017.
MK53 HCH
Greg2017-03-14 01:34:08
Sounds like James is the owner of that car and not happy with what has been posted of his slut of a wife driver 😂. She deserves all the shit she gets trown at her when everyone else you know finds out! Typical woman driver! Shouldn't be on the road!!
Sounds like James is the owner of that car and not happy with what has been posted of his slut of a wife driver 😂. She deserves all the shit she gets trown at her when everyone else you know finds out! Typical woman driver! Shouldn't be on the road!!
MK53 HCH
The Real James2017-03-14 09:56:35
The second photograph still shows the dashcam car doing 23 mph, 1mph quicker than in the first photograph, as the oncoming car is exiting the tunnel. The lack of footage and the unnecessarily derogatory words indicate the dashcam car driver is full of shit and is driving like a bellend.
The second photograph still shows the dashcam car doing 23 mph, 1mph quicker than in the first photograph, as the oncoming car is exiting the tunnel. The lack of footage and the unnecessarily derogatory words indicate the dashcam car driver is full of shit and is driving like a bellend.
MK53 HCH
JT2017-03-13 21:10:03
Without dash cam footage it is difficult to say if the driver pictured is at fault, from the stills it appears the oncoming vehicle is already at the bridge entrance before the camera car has reached the start of the priority zone. The priority starts at the sign and a vehicle may correctly enter from the non priority end if they judge an approaching vehicle is some distance from entering the zone. If the cam driver was approaching with caution, as is appropriate in this situation, it is difficult to see how the oncoming diver could “take them out under a tunnel” as they would be going slow enough to stop. In these’s situations I always find caution and courtesy to other road users is the best way to proceed.
Without dash cam footage it is difficult to say if the driver pictured is at fault, from the stills it appears the oncoming vehicle is already at the bridge entrance before the camera car has reached the start of the priority zone. The priority starts at the sign and a vehicle may correctly enter from the non priority end if they judge an approaching vehicle is some distance from entering the zone. If the cam driver was approaching with caution, as is appropriate in this situation, it is difficult to see how the oncoming diver could “take them out under a tunnel” as they would be going slow enough to stop. In these’s situations I always find caution and courtesy to other road users is the best way to proceed.
MK53 HCH
James2017-03-14 00:02:19
Dashcam footage has not been provided as it will prove exactly that.
Dashcam footage has not been provided as it will prove exactly that.
MK53 HCH
2017-03-13 10:55:58
The woman is clearly at fault, she should have waited as she could clearly see the other driver by the looks of things. I've seen this happen by so many drivers, they just don't give a shit and think they own the road
The woman is clearly at fault, she should have waited as she could clearly see the other driver by the looks of things. I've seen this happen by so many drivers, they just don't give a shit and think they own the road
MK53 HCH
James2017-03-12 22:17:52
Looks like she had started to enter the tunnel before you got to the approach. Why so close to the tunnel entrance when you can see her coming through? Looking forward to the dash cam footage.
Looks like she had started to enter the tunnel before you got to the approach. Why so close to the tunnel entrance when you can see her coming through? Looking forward to the dash cam footage.
MK53 HCH
2017-03-13 00:21:42
No the arrogant bitch seen us! And did not stop like their side is supposed to do! Clearly states we have priority over on coming vehicles! They are supposed to stop!!
No the arrogant bitch seen us! And did not stop like their side is supposed to do! Clearly states we have priority over on coming vehicles! They are supposed to stop!!
MK53 HCH
2017-03-12 20:07:06
Dangerous pathetic woman driver! Nearly took us out under a tunnel when our side clearly has priority! Stupid slut should have waited, totally arrogant piece of shit and should not be on the road! Will be reported with dash cam footage as well!
Dangerous pathetic woman driver! Nearly took us out under a tunnel when our side clearly has priority! Stupid slut should have waited, totally arrogant piece of shit and should not be on the road! Will be reported with dash cam footage as well!
MK53 HCH
2017-03-14 18:47:58
01:53:44 I think Sid James is using some new aliases of late. But you are not the only person getting pissed off with their rubbish. Pity Sid can't find a sand pit and some buckets to occupy their mind whilst the adults are looking at this site.....
01:53:44 I think Sid James is using some new aliases of late. But you are not the only person getting pissed off with their rubbish. Pity Sid can't find a sand pit and some buckets to occupy their mind whilst the adults are looking at this site.....
MK53 HCH
Igman2017-03-14 10:03:39
1. You are a sexist pig. How on earth could this incident make the driver a "slut"
2. The woman is clearly well into the tunnel before you get to the priority sign. The sign does not mean you have priority over a car already coming through the tunnel.
3. You clearly ignore such logical thinking and proceed to engineer a situation in which you perceive she is trying to "take you out".
4. Your ego is clearly dented because she is a woman.
5. Please take the footage to the police, they deserve a good laugh.
6. Point them at this site and they will be charging you with sexist abuse.
7. Please let us see the video footage.
1. You are a sexist pig. How on earth could this incident make the driver a "slut"
2. The woman is clearly well into the tunnel before you get to the priority sign. The sign does not mean you have priority over a car already coming through the tunnel.
3. You clearly ignore such logical thinking and proceed to engineer a situation in which you perceive she is trying to "take you out".
4. Your ego is clearly dented because she is a woman.
5. Please take the footage to the police, they deserve a good laugh.
6. Point them at this site and they will be charging you with sexist abuse.
7. Please let us see the video footage.
MK53 HCH
Anon2017-03-13 01:53:44
The only person who is likely to be critical no matter if you have factual evidence to prove the offending vehicle is at fault is James
aka SidJames aka a few other id's
I suggest you just take a quick look at other threads and make your own assumptions then be sensible and don't give the brainless troll oxygen to breathe
HTH
The only person who is likely to be critical no matter if you have factual evidence to prove the offending vehicle is at fault is James
aka SidJames aka a few other id's
I suggest you just take a quick look at other threads and make your own assumptions then be sensible and don't give the brainless troll oxygen to breathe
HTH
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
I blame the cyclist or motorcycle because they're gay