Registration plate ML64XHK
Official local mnemonic: Manchester and Merseyside
Postal area: Manchester
Issued: between september 2014 and february 2015
White Volkswagen Polo, manufactured in 2014, first registered on 1 September 2014. Cylinder capacity: 1197cc, CO2 emissions: 109 g/km.
As of 26 September 2017 this vehicle had done 5,238 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 November 2019
✗ No MOT Expired: 29 September 2019

MOT history

Test dateExpiry dateResultOdometer reading
2017-09-262018-09-29 Pass5,238

Rate driver

2
20

Comments

ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 07:10:45

we beeped once. We never passed once. We only asked you to go round thebime which i still believe itt was safe until he did speed up. Imnot sure why you got to viscious with us. You almost went into road rage syndrome. Any way sorry for beeping. I didn't realise we were in thewrong to ask you to pass a bike which again was going less than ten mile an hour on our speedometer
Rate this comment:
+
9
-
ML64 XHK 2017-04-03 15:10:49

When I am on a bike and going slower (around <10 mph) I have absolutely no problem with anyone over-taking me as long as they give me room and don't run into oncoming traffic. Lots of times I am over-taken far too closely. Several times I have been almost sandwiched into railings or car doors and it was only by miracle that I wasn't injured or killed. I think the cam driver did an excellent job here and that the beeper was totally in the wrong. Look how fast that oncoming car approaches having appeared almost from nowhere in the dip. The cyclist was also riding secondary, which some might say is not the best position here if one wants to deter bad driving. The road system was originally designed only for horses and carts and situations like this are a consequence.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
ML64 XHK 2017-04-01 23:52:17

a lot of drivers sit behind slow pedal cycles when there is a solid line thinking they can't overtake when they can but in this video it wasn't safe and car behind was wrong to beep
Rate this comment:
+
6
-
ML64 XHK 2017-04-01 15:32:42

You said it wasn't you driving and then went on to explain the situation in detail so I take it you were the driver after all. These lies don't do much for your credibility. At the very least you're guilty of sounding your horn when it wasn't necessary so you could be prosecuted for that. Maybe tailgating too if that's what you were doing. You could also be prosecuted for careless or inconsiderate driving. Think about that next time. I doubt the uploader of the video wants to take things further but be careful because next time you act in this way you could get a fine and penalty points on your licence or even a ban. Is it really worth it?
Rate this comment:
+
6
-
ML64 XHK 2017-04-01 11:27:29

It was the wrong area and number plate. Or was it not?
Anyway. I'll leave you pathetic people to get on with your hobbie as i have better things to do.
Again sorry for the beep. I never broke any laws nor did i do anything wrong.
Rate this comment:
+
5
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-31 16:11:44

Brett you mong welcome to the internet. You said this wasn't you and that it was the wrong number plate and area plus went on to threaten legal action but then 13 minutes later left another comment that proves your previous comment was codswallop so I'm guess your lawyer told you to do one.

What is all this "we" business about? We beeped once... We never passed... Was someone holding your hand petal? How many people were driving your vehicle?

Improper use of your horn is an offence. You still think the car in front should have overtaken the bicycle when it wasn't safe so that shows that you are definitely a dickwad.
Rate this comment:
+
9
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 16:45:01

How is over-taking up an incline a safe thing to do especially with such poor visibility?
Rate this comment:
+
7
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 09:39:06

Fuck face? This is like road rage behind a keyboard. You're worse than half the drivers on the road doing this
Rate this comment:
+
6
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 09:31:19

Dickwad? Are you all keyboard warriors or children. lawyer? We have not broken any law. We beeped. We never broke a law
Rate this comment:
+
7
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 08:12:11

But I thought it was wrong plate and wrong area. Have you contacted your lawyer dickwad? Thought not because everything was true, wasn't it fuckface?
Rate this comment:
+
9
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 06:57:54

Hi this is not us. Wrong number plate and wrong area. Please remove slanderous comments or you will be taken to court.
Rate this comment:
+
10
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 15:51:16

Clearly contradicted by your later comments Mr Wood. Get your facts straight and we might believe you.
Rate this comment:
+
8
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-29 09:03:29

Good on you and fuck the driver behind, Do not forget people you have to thumbs UP this video as to the driver and the driver in this video is the camera car and so by not being bullied they have done the right thing so THUMBS UP
Rate this comment:
+
11
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 11:57:38

Can I make a suggestion?

Everyone, take a deep breath. Delete this entry and re-submit so as to clarify the detail regarding the reg and alleged company (I personally do not know what if any affiliation this reg may or may not have with said company or whether or not they would even condone such actions). Then, everyone have their say hopefully in a constructive way.

Note: this is just a suggestion. It is not meant to be a lecture. I'm suggesting it because there are so many video's on here where (some) people see bike and just attack. Likewise some people see a company name and think they would condone something, or see a video and assume the driver would not say hey I put my hands up I made a mistake let's move on. And where does that get us, as a society? More divided, it would appear. Thank you.
Rate this comment:
+
5
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 06:25:04

I thought ML64XHK would be the reg of the bad driver, so the van. Is that right?
Rate this comment:
+
8
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 03:31:34

Folks, just to confirm, you are saying this reg pertains to the company below, right?
Rate this comment:
+
8
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-29 15:27:21

No, you dim wit. You are rating ML64 XHK. THUMBS DOWN.
Rate this comment:
+
8
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-29 08:38:23

Trying to bully driver to overtake cyclist where solid white lines are present.
Rate this comment:
+
14
-
ML64 XHK 2017-04-02 09:36:26

Nice one Ron, you're a funny man unlike the foul mouthed C driving the car.
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
ML64 XHK 2017-04-01 20:50:01

No one likes the C word. Cancer causes a lot of misery.
Rate this comment:
+
7
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 14:21:08

I take it there were no kids in the car. I hate the C word.
Rate this comment:
+
5
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 03:41:53

After the brow there is also a turning, on the opposite side. The tooting tit needs to re-take a driving test before they kill someone through their own arrogant negligence..
Rate this comment:
+
8
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-30 03:27:37

Everyone, pause at 00:53. You can clearly see the brow of a hill - even if the cyclist were going at 10 mph or less, it would have been reckless and dangerous to over-take them . To the driver beeping..you are a prick and you shouldn't be on the road. Unfortunately for you however, you came across 3 other road users who weren't going to be bullied. Fuck you. I hope you're fined.
Rate this comment:
+
10
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-29 21:00:52

Correct, but in this case, the cyclist is definitely going in excess of 10mph.
Rate this comment:
+
7
-
ML64 XHK 2017-03-29 16:41:07

The van driver was impatient, no doubt about that. I'm not sure of the speeds involved here but I just wanted to point out that you can legally cross solid white lines to overtake slow moving cyclists.

Highway Code Rule 129
Double white lines where the line nearest you is solid. This means you MUST NOT cross or straddle it unless it is safe and you need to enter adjoining premises or a side road. You may cross the line if necessary, provided the road is clear, to pass a stationary vehicle, or overtake a pedal cycle, horse or road maintenance vehicle, if they are travelling at 10 mph (16 km/h) or less.
Rate this comment:
+
14
-

Add comment

Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Select files
You agree that you accept our rules

Worst drivers in January

  1. LC06 OPH
  2. B21 DSG
  3. HJ12 GYK
  4. VK72 SGZ
  5. NL67 ONG
  6. HX65 KXG
  7. B16 TAJ
  8. KP68 VDV
  9. DG17 YPL
  10. SP09 RKA

View drivers' rankings from previous months »

Do you like us?
or transfer some Bitcoins to 1L9Sd6UhYrugmYzp8Zv4iQtZoLRLdvWHPV