Registration plate NA05XWF
Official local mnemonic: North
Postal area: Newcastle
Issued: between march 2005 and august 2005
Silver Nissan Almera, manufactured in 2005, first registered on 1 March 2005. Cylinder capacity: 1497cc, CO2 emissions: 160 g/km.
As of 15 February 2017 this vehicle had done 73,190 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 217,400 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 April 2018
✗ No MOT Expired: 14 March 2018

MOT history

Test dateExpiry dateResultOdometer reading
2017-02-152018-03-14 Pass73,190
  • Nearside Rear tyre worn on inner shoulder close to cords
  • Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to the legal limit tread (4.1.E.1)
  • Nearside Obligatory mirror damaged, but not seriously affecting the rear view (8.1.2a)
  • Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a seal rack (2.3.3b)
2016-03-152017-03-14 Pass58,316
  • offside rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
  • centre Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
  • both front mirrors broken
2016-03-14- Fail58,316
  • offside rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
  • centre Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
  • both front mirrors broken
2014-07-022015-07-01 Pass59,667
  • Drivers door mirror back cover missing
  • Nearside door mirror glass cracked
  • Both headlight patterns appear dim in beamsetter lens
  • Oil deposit around offside steering rack boot
  • Minor bind on offside front and rear brakes
2014-06-25- Fail59,624
  • Drivers door mirror back cover missing
  • Nearside door mirror glass cracked
  • Both headlight patterns appear dim in beamsetter lens
  • Oil deposit around offside steering rack boot
  • Minor bind on offside front and rear brakes
2013-06-062014-06-05 Pass53,007
  • Offside Front Obligatory mirror damaged, but not seriously affecting the rear view (8.1.2a)
2013-06-06- Fail53,007
  • Offside Front Obligatory mirror damaged, but not seriously affecting the rear view (8.1.2a)
2012-05-252013-05-24 Pass46,053
2012-05-25- Fail46,053
  • Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
  • Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
2010-12-022011-12-01 Pass35,227
  • airbag warning light on
2009-07-102010-07-09 Pass26,327
  • Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  • Nearside rear tyre close to limit
  • Slight bind offside front brake
  • Air bag warning light illuminated
2009-07-09- Fail26,318
  • Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  • Nearside rear tyre close to limit
  • Slight bind offside front brake
2008-06-052009-06-04 Pass18,551

Rate driver

3
6

Comments

NA05 XWF 2016-10-26 09:16:24

My lord what the hell have i stumbled upon. I came to this website to see what people have been saying about other peoples driving never expected to find what i have found. Now can someone tell me where i can find a website where there are only views on peoples driving, Thank you
Rate this comment:
+
4
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-28 02:00:12

You found a gateway to another dimension.
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-26 09:25:02

Strewth mate i agree and i'm from oz, before somebody takes a poke at me i am really from Australia and how i stumbled onto this site was for the very reason that my mate in the uk emailed me the link, i think my mate sent me the wrong link by mistake as all i see is something totally different that comments on folks driving habits
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-25 17:03:16

I have closed down my account due to the hate that this has caused on this website

The truth is i never uploaded these videos to this website and whom ever it was i really hope that you are happy with your work as it has caused my channel to be attacked by haters

As to all those that have posted negative comments on this website you really need to get a life and just get on with your own pathetic little world

My videos never took the piss out of people just the oppsite actually

I am somewhat angry at the owner of this site allowing this kind of hate as well as verbal abuse to carry on his website

This is why i am contacting TRUE VISION
as well as ACTION FRAUD and IWF as children come onto this website as the comments are specified as abuse towards people of which could be children as their is no verification box for people to tick confirming them of their age

I will post this website on a very well respected Forum of which i believe they will help to bring down this website

Its sad that what started off as a place to but your views on peoples driving has become a site directed at nothing more than hate and abuse


http://report-it.org.uk/reporting_internet_hate_crime
www.actionfraud.police.uk/
https://www.iwf.org.uk/
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-25 18:44:57

Do you realise what kind of people will relish people like you, taking down your channels and promising to get this site shut down? If I may, I'd like to give you a little clue..



They don't like being filmed. Their actions appear self-evident, and incriminating. Are you going to let people like THIS closed your channel, and this site? Don't do it.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-25 18:37:30

Observe. Don't abolish all hope.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-25 18:37:11

Observe. Don't absorb.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-25 18:26:13

Observe. Don't absolve.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-25 18:24:01

"The truth is i never uploaded these videos to this website and whom ever it was i really hope that you are happy with your work as it has caused my channel to be attacked by haters"

I've had channels attacked in the same manner. You know what I did? After a while I just ignored them. I've posted video's of people being assaulted and had some very nasty comments made towards me. My video's still remain. Haters want attention, and by closing your channel you are doing just that. I really don't understand why you care whether someone else posted the video here..it's the way these things work. Video's get referred to everywhere on the net and people comment. Most people understand that you can't be held responsible for every comment and every site.

And your video's show people doing things. Of course people will comment on them whether for or against the focal point or person. People will commend or criticice. idiots will spout hate. Some will spam, and flood. it just goes with the territory does it not? Shutting down sites you don't like, sites that refer to your video's is just lame in my opinion. Why not work with the site owners and as you see it make it better? I know what happens on here, some people do abuse it. Some people do make threats, and false accusations. That includes paid operatives who, thanks to people like you, ensure freedom of speach becomes a thing of the past. By trying to get this site shut down and by closing your YT channel all you're doing is becoming a part of the problem not the solution. Surely you must see that not everything on this site is the same; that not everyone here is a hater or time-waster? That there are video's that appear to show pretty clear renditions of the kinds of things you like to film? So you are going to ruin all THAT because you don't agree with someone commenting on you video's on another site, namely You Tube. Come on dude.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-25 18:00:59

That's just silly. Honestly, regardless of what is allegedly said here, or anywhere, it does not imply you are personally responsible. If people cannot be bothered to read a video description well that is their problem - not yours. And there will always be haters/trolls/spoilters/paid agitators/governm8nt shills etc no matter where you go. By closing your YT channel you are basically saying they are right..surely you don't want that? Your videos of potentially bad drivers are a much-needed resource; they make our roads safer because they act as a form of deterrent. You're throwing all that away on account of one video? Come on. Don't do it. Be bigger than the people trying to bring you down for the good you do.
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-24 20:55:56

This one is classic.. Watch the driver behind my car
First of all he had to suddenly break, Wasn't sure if he had seen my car lol

Next was the funny bit, He gets out of his car pretty easily and uses his crutch/stick and when he catches glimpse of my camera he then decides to limp

Now watch on his way back from the cash machine back to his car a minute later he forgets to use his crutch/stick and totally forgets about his limp lol

Only when he gets back into his car his passenger must have told him that he forgot to limp etc and both look at my camera wondering if it was recording or not (Red light flashing means recording)

When they finally pull away they give me and my camera the evil eye... THE FORGOTTEN LIMP LOL

Rate this comment:
+
0
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-25 18:35:23

Disclaimer: I am not affiliated with anyone shown in this video, or with the uploader, or anyone else commenting here. I make no financial or personal gain whatsoever from commenting. Everything I'd posted here is my opinion only.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
NA05 XWF 2016-10-25 18:32:29

"Only when he gets back into his car his passenger must have told him that he forgot to limp etc and both look at my camera wondering if it was recording or not (Red light flashing means recording)"

That's not a given. That's your observational interpretation which, in turn, becomes an outright accusation. I think it would instead have been more appropriate to use question marks, which in turn can keep video's active and mitigate yourself from potential legal action by people who wouldn't think twice of suing you for deformation and slander. Note: this isn't me trying to threaten or deter you. It's not that at all. This is me trying to keep your content active and the dialogue flowing. What if someone filmed you in the street and made certain kinds of accusations? You wouldn't like it, right? Well this is the same. The full facts weren't presented in that video and people deserve a right to defend themselves. There are also many, many hidden illness including hidden mental illnesses that can vary in their reliability and repeatability. Saying someone doesn't need a stick because they forgot it..Iaan Duncan Smith did exactly the same and most of us here know exactly how that turned out (hint: it didn't go well for him especially following the disabled rights groups protests). .
Rate this comment:
+
0
-

Add comment

Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Select files
You agree that you accept our rules

Worst drivers in January

  1. H8 FEM
  2. SX67 SVN
  3. I0 IOT
  4. LL00 OLL
  5. NA66 ERS
  6. CAR 0000
  7. IOI 010I
  8. I010 IOI
  9. O101 OIO
  10. OIO 101O

View drivers' rankings from previous months »

Do you like us?
or transfer some Bitcoins to 1L9Sd6UhYrugmYzp8Zv4iQtZoLRLdvWHPV