| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
| 2016-12-19 | 2017-12-23 | ✓ Pass | 143,007 |
- Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
- nearside Anti-roll bar linkage worn but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
- Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
|
| 2016-12-19 | - | ✗ Fail | 143,995 |
- Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
- nearside Anti-roll bar linkage worn but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
- Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
|
| 2015-12-10 | 2016-12-23 | ✓ Pass | 140,526 |
- offside front Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
- nearside front Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| 2014-12-20 | 2015-12-23 | ✓ Pass | 136,406 |
| 2014-12-20 | - | ✗ Fail | 136,406 |
| 2013-12-19 | 2014-12-23 | ✓ Pass | 129,740 |
- Offside Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
- Nearside Front Anti-roll bar has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
- Nearside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
|
| 2012-11-26 | 2013-12-23 | ✓ Pass | 126,427 |
| 2012-11-26 | - | ✗ Fail | 126,427 |
| 2011-12-09 | 2012-12-23 | ✓ Pass | 126,300 |
- Nail in nearside rear tyre
- slight drag offside handbrake
|
| 2010-12-24 | 2011-12-23 | ✓ Pass | 120,967 |
| 2009-07-22 | 2010-07-23 | ✓ Pass | 116,110 |
| 2009-07-22 | - | ✗ Fail | 116,110 |
| 2008-07-12 | 2009-07-23 | ✓ Pass | 109,907 |
| 2007-07-24 | 2008-07-23 | ✓ Pass | 102,232 |
| 2006-07-08 | 2007-07-07 | ✓ Pass | 92,909 |
| 2006-07-08 | - | ✗ Fail | 92,909 |
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- oil leak
|
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Absolute piece of work. Passed within 10cm of me on my bike - claimed that it wasn't dangerous because he "hadn't actually hit me" and because "he paid tax on his vehicle". Which apparently gives him the right to endanger those around him.