Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: North
Postal area: Stockton
Issued: between september 2010 and february 2011
White Mercedes Vito, manufactured in 2010, first registered on 1 October 2010. Cylinder capacity: 2148cc.
As of 18 September 2017 this vehicle had done 55,644 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 157,700 miles.
Official local mnemonic: NorthPostal area: Stockton
Issued: between september 2010 and february 2011
White Mercedes Vito, manufactured in 2010, first registered on 1 October 2010. Cylinder capacity: 2148cc.
As of 18 September 2017 this vehicle had done 55,644 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 157,700 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 October 2019
✗ No MOT Expired: 1 October 2019
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-18 | 2018-10-01 | ✓ Pass | 55,644 |
| 2016-09-09 | 2017-10-01 | ✓ Pass | 42,931 |
| |||
| 2015-10-01 | 2016-10-01 | ✓ Pass | 34,841 |
| |||
| 2015-09-29 | - | ✗ Fail | 34,841 |
| |||
| 2014-09-22 | 2015-10-01 | ✓ Pass | 27,106 |
| 2014-09-22 | - | ✗ Fail | 27,106 |
| 2013-09-16 | 2014-10-01 | ✓ Pass | 22,979 |
Rate driver
Comments
NX60 DKA
2017-02-17 15:29:34
I agree the fact is - if you don''t speed you won't get caught. But I also agree that many, many speed cameras are used as nothing but cash cows.
For instance one well-known case. A road with a 50 mph coming down to 30. A camera placed near a tree branch near the sign, giving drivers next to no time to alter their speed. People being prosecuted for 1 mph "over". Is that fair? And then there's the countless number of roads in this country that do suffer speeders and idiots - not ONE single camera in sight. And what about footage given to the police from road users including cyclists, that gets tossed aside or just "lost in the system"?
This is what gets people angry.. the double standards. In places where cameras are needed you often don't see any and nor do you see any willingness on the part of the police to clamp down on dangerous driving. Yet they have no problem apparently with cameras put on bends in order to rake in as much profit as possible from innocent, unsuspecting people going about their business. This is the way it's always been in this country - one rule for the criminals, bankers and politicians and one rule for the bloody rest of us. If the police want full backing for these cameras then they should give the public full and proper support in return.
I agree the fact is - if you don''t speed you won't get caught. But I also agree that many, many speed cameras are used as nothing but cash cows.
For instance one well-known case. A road with a 50 mph coming down to 30. A camera placed near a tree branch near the sign, giving drivers next to no time to alter their speed. People being prosecuted for 1 mph "over". Is that fair? And then there's the countless number of roads in this country that do suffer speeders and idiots - not ONE single camera in sight. And what about footage given to the police from road users including cyclists, that gets tossed aside or just "lost in the system"?
This is what gets people angry.. the double standards. In places where cameras are needed you often don't see any and nor do you see any willingness on the part of the police to clamp down on dangerous driving. Yet they have no problem apparently with cameras put on bends in order to rake in as much profit as possible from innocent, unsuspecting people going about their business. This is the way it's always been in this country - one rule for the criminals, bankers and politicians and one rule for the bloody rest of us. If the police want full backing for these cameras then they should give the public full and proper support in return.
NX60 DKA
Noah2017-02-16 18:24:41
http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/fed-up-driver-gets-revenge-12609223
http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/fed-up-driver-gets-revenge-12609223
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
I'm only posting this to canvass opinions. Do you think the man was justified in this actions - do you feel the police were justified in what they were doing?
Also regarding his alleged subsequent "visit". The police reportedly said he was lucky he wasn't done for harassment. I would personally call that into question and even might go on to suggest that police in question could be accused of the same. I see no actual crime being committed - if there were he would have been detained or arrested at the scene. I'd question on the lawful basis (if any) on which they entered his property other than a friendly chat. Did their chat seem friendly, or threatening? I think he should have refused to let them in or even engage with them in any way. I don't fully agree with his actions from a moral viewpoint, but I certainly do not like what appears to be the implied threat in response. Many of these speed checks aren't put in places where there's accident black-spots, they are seen as nothing but a cash-cow. And furthermore I see countless people WALKING (or rather loitering) on local streets, being rude and aggressive to innocent people - not one single PCSO or police officer in sight and not one single police station open. So yeah, I get pissed off sometimes too.
Well these are just my thoughts. I mean nobody an ill harm, I just want your feedback. Thanks for your time.