Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: Preston
Postal area: Preston
Issued: between september 2016 and february 2017
Grey Dacia, manufactured in 2016, first registered on 1 September 2016. Cylinder capacity: 1461cc, CO2 emissions: 115 g/km.
Official local mnemonic: PrestonPostal area: Preston
Issued: between september 2016 and february 2017
Grey Dacia, manufactured in 2016, first registered on 1 September 2016. Cylinder capacity: 1461cc, CO2 emissions: 115 g/km.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 September 2019
MOT: No details
Rate driver
Comments
PK66 LRL
PK66LRL2017-04-05 18:02:27
Rate this comment:
+
14
-
PK66 LRL
2017-04-10 05:23:32
As mentioned, the cyclist's position makes no difference here. The responsibility is on the driver to over-take safely. Blaming the cyclist is like blaming a pedestrian hit by a car mounting the pavement because the pedestrian was in their way..
As mentioned, the cyclist's position makes no difference here. The responsibility is on the driver to over-take safely. Blaming the cyclist is like blaming a pedestrian hit by a car mounting the pavement because the pedestrian was in their way..
PK66 LRL
2017-04-10 04:07:01
"Cyclist was riding in the gutter instead of riding central and taking the lane. He brought this upon himself."
If the cyclists was in the middle of the road you would be complaining. These cyclists just can't win.
"Cyclist was riding in the gutter instead of riding central and taking the lane. He brought this upon himself."
If the cyclists was in the middle of the road you would be complaining. These cyclists just can't win.
PK66 LRL
2017-04-09 05:28:38
"He's got miles of empty pavement to cycle along, but oh, no, he just has to use the road and hold everything up. To top all that he doesn't even pay road tax so should not be on the road at all."
Sam you come across as being very dim and/or a troll.
You post logical fallacies regarding the cyclist and the pavement when it is obvious that a) the cyclist is FULLY entitled to be on the road, and b), it has NO BEARING on what happened here.
You then bleat on about "Road Tax", which does NOT exist. Roads are funded indirectly and as such, MOST PEOPLE PAY WHETHER THEY WALK, CYCLE, DRIVE OR GET THE BUS.
Are you on the right bus? You know, the one going forwards instead of off a cliff into the abyss of stupidity and trolling. Your choice. But know this. If you act like a prick troll on here then people will tend to treat you as such. Perhaps it's time you grew up?
"He's got miles of empty pavement to cycle along, but oh, no, he just has to use the road and hold everything up. To top all that he doesn't even pay road tax so should not be on the road at all."
Sam you come across as being very dim and/or a troll.
You post logical fallacies regarding the cyclist and the pavement when it is obvious that a) the cyclist is FULLY entitled to be on the road, and b), it has NO BEARING on what happened here.
You then bleat on about "Road Tax", which does NOT exist. Roads are funded indirectly and as such, MOST PEOPLE PAY WHETHER THEY WALK, CYCLE, DRIVE OR GET THE BUS.
Are you on the right bus? You know, the one going forwards instead of off a cliff into the abyss of stupidity and trolling. Your choice. But know this. If you act like a prick troll on here then people will tend to treat you as such. Perhaps it's time you grew up?
PK66 LRL
2017-04-08 13:56:23
It's not just electric vehicles, mobility scooters and ride-on lawnmowers that are exempt. There are other classes of vehicles exempt, including classic vehicles (made before 1977), disabled vehicles, certain agricultural vehicles. Until last week, vehicles emitting less than 99g/km were also exempt (that covered a lot of models from different car manufacturers). How could cyclists possibly be made to pay when these vehicles do not?
It's not just electric vehicles, mobility scooters and ride-on lawnmowers that are exempt. There are other classes of vehicles exempt, including classic vehicles (made before 1977), disabled vehicles, certain agricultural vehicles. Until last week, vehicles emitting less than 99g/km were also exempt (that covered a lot of models from different car manufacturers). How could cyclists possibly be made to pay when these vehicles do not?
PK66 LRL
2017-04-08 10:39:07
"As for "road tax", you do realise certain vehicles are also exempt, so should they not be on the road?"
Yeah, electric vehicles and lawnmowers. LOL
"As for "road tax", you do realise certain vehicles are also exempt, so should they not be on the road?"
Yeah, electric vehicles and lawnmowers. LOL
PK66 LRL
Nigel2017-04-08 01:56:15
So Sam, you think the cyclist should disobey the law by riding on the pavement and risk getting fined by police?
As for "road tax", you do realise certain vehicles are also exempt, so should they not be on the road?
So Sam, you think the cyclist should disobey the law by riding on the pavement and risk getting fined by police?
As for "road tax", you do realise certain vehicles are also exempt, so should they not be on the road?
PK66 LRL
Sam2017-04-07 15:36:43
He's got miles of empty pavement to cycle along, but oh, no, he just has to use the road and hold everything up. To top all that he doesn't even pay road tax so should not be on the road at all.
He's got miles of empty pavement to cycle along, but oh, no, he just has to use the road and hold everything up. To top all that he doesn't even pay road tax so should not be on the road at all.
PK66 LRL
Dr Ian Walker2017-04-07 08:43:09
"And your source for this?" - me! Sure, my credibility is under question but who gives a ****.
"And your source for this?" - me! Sure, my credibility is under question but who gives a ****.
PK66 LRL
2017-04-07 05:26:02
"Cyclist was riding in the gutter instead of riding central and taking the lane. He brought this upon himself."
Fail. Regardless of the cyclist's preference for primary/central or secondary, is it the driver's responsibility to over-take safely. Stop victim-blaming.
"He was also wearing a helmet which, as we all know, gives a false impression of competency and encourages drivers to leave less room than for competent (non-helmeted) cyclists."
And your source for this?
"Cyclist was riding in the gutter instead of riding central and taking the lane. He brought this upon himself."
Fail. Regardless of the cyclist's preference for primary/central or secondary, is it the driver's responsibility to over-take safely. Stop victim-blaming.
"He was also wearing a helmet which, as we all know, gives a false impression of competency and encourages drivers to leave less room than for competent (non-helmeted) cyclists."
And your source for this?
PK66 LRL
Folger2017-04-06 09:19:07
Cyclist was riding in the gutter instead of riding central and taking the lane. He brought this upon himself. He was also wearing a helmet which, as we all know, gives a false impression of competency and encourages drivers to leave less room than for competent (non-helmeted) cyclists. I suggest the cyclist undertake some basic training.
Cyclist was riding in the gutter instead of riding central and taking the lane. He brought this upon himself. He was also wearing a helmet which, as we all know, gives a false impression of competency and encourages drivers to leave less room than for competent (non-helmeted) cyclists. I suggest the cyclist undertake some basic training.
PK66 LRL
2017-04-06 04:33:57
Bloody hell. Good job you were paying attention cus that driver certainly wasn't.
Bloody hell. Good job you were paying attention cus that driver certainly wasn't.
PK66 LRL
Anon2017-04-06 01:01:54
Wouldn't it be a wonderful day if the police actually visited the driver and issued them with a Sec 59 and a warning that if they repeat such a stupid, dangerous overtake then their vehicle will be scrapped.
And that a "confirmed" member of that police force acknowledged on here of that action.
I know, I know fairy tales don't really happen but one can dream.
Wouldn't it be a wonderful day if the police actually visited the driver and issued them with a Sec 59 and a warning that if they repeat such a stupid, dangerous overtake then their vehicle will be scrapped.
And that a "confirmed" member of that police force acknowledged on here of that action.
I know, I know fairy tales don't really happen but one can dream.
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment