Registration plate RJ57VJN
Official local mnemonic: Reading
Postal area: Reading
Issued: between september 2007 and february 2008
Silver Renault Clio, manufactured in 2007, first registered on 1 November 2007. Cylinder capacity: 1461cc.
As of 11 January 2018 this vehicle had done 102,155 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 176,900 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 January 2019
✗ No MOT Expired: 13 January 2019

MOT history

Test dateExpiry dateResultOdometer reading
2018-01-112019-01-13 Pass102,155
2018-01-11- Fail102,155
  • Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
  • Nearside Front suspension has excessive play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
2017-01-042018-01-13 Pass91,002
2017-01-04- Fail91,002
2016-01-052017-01-13 Pass78,873
2016-01-05- Fail78,851
  • nearside rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
2015-01-122016-01-13 Pass66,854
  • Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2015-01-05- Fail66,634
  • Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2014-01-062015-01-13 Pass53,792
  • Play in steering rack inner joint(s)
2013-01-142014-01-13 Pass44,045
  • n/s/f wheel rim slightly bent from out side2>slight play in offside front track rod end ball joint
2013-01-14- Fail44,043
  • Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
  • n/s/f wheel rim slightly bent from out side2>slight play in offside front track rod end ball joint
2011-11-262012-11-30 Pass37,386
  • Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2011-11-24- Fail37,386
  • Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Spare tyre defective
  • Clutch pedal anti slip missing
2010-11-252011-11-30 Pass30,190
  • Nearside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
  • Offside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)

Rate driver

0
10

Comments

RJ57 VJN 2016-04-21 21:00:43

I got not problem with complaining to someone about allegedly using a phone whilst driving. The problem however is the way you went about it. You've effectively absolved the driver either to a limited or full extend purely by virtue of the manner in which you approached them. You've giving them a defence in court without even realising it. Please note, I am not trying to attack you; rather, trying to emphasise the point that with certain types of people a certain type of approach will always illicit a certain type of response on their part. Don't take that risk. Always be firm but fair, unless you have no choice. I think you had that choice here. The police will take one look at this and - being the pedantic useless buggers many of them seem to be - will simply say you're lucky you aren't being fined for a Section 59 offence. The fact he's driving a car and using a phone won't come into it. Sorry folks but that's just the way things are these days. Do not give people like this an avenue.. do not give them ammunition by losing your cool. Simply say something like "Sir, that's stupid, dangerous and illegal - do you realise that?" It's an open, cordial question. Swearing and name-calling is just waving a flag to a bull, hence, you'll only get one type of response. You might have a strong case for other offences but the shouting, swearing and name-calling doesn't help and most importantly it puts you at great risk. If you've exhausted all reasonable redress then fine, kick his ass to kingdom come until such a time as you can make haste your escape..chances are nothing will happen (not to you at least). Do not show yourself in any way to be the aggressor because I can assure you, people like this can and will try and use it against you. Excuse my language too, but fuck them; life's too short. Just do the cordial approach and fuck them. They are not worth the hassle.
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
RJ57 VJN 2016-04-22 18:55:37

kkk I will try and improve it.

p.s. someone once did something similar to me, however this was the days before You Tube, etc. Basically tried to grab me but didn't understand the laws of physics so I just blasted through him. I told the cops this, but since I was acting out of fear it wasn't me who had a visit. I also had witnesses, fortunately, who stopped to help. Some crazy shit happening on our roads even with the abundance of cameras..
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
RJ57 VJN 2016-04-22 04:53:55

p.s. any more trolling and you'll just be ignored.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
RJ57 VJN 2016-04-22 04:51:15

',' why don't you stop trolling and start commenting on what actually happened..or is that too hard for you? I wonder if you could possibly be one of the well-known trolls on You Tube who basically stalks countless cycling-orientated video's and tries to stir the pot so to speak; basically on account of their cycle-hating attitude. You concentrate on this video, why don't you? I don't see anything wrong in what anon typed..fix your own faults first, buster.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
RJ57 VJN 2016-04-21 21:36:25

You've clearly spent a good amount of time composing your post lovely and verbose that it is .

However a little bit of grammar , punctuation and formatting may make things easier to read in the future .
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
RJ57 VJN 2016-04-21 21:15:20

I also think you did the right thing by NOT stopping..never, ever stop unless you have no other choice. Just ride on. The more you ignore them, the worse it gets for them and I say this regardless of whether they are on a push-bike, motorbike, car, lorry or on foot. Stopping just gives them an avenue and some people know what 'buttons to press' in order to force you into a position whereby you are raising your guard, then assaulting you, and playing the victim when it comes to filling out police reports. They do it all the time. That's what scum does. Arguing with them just plays on their level.. a childish, juvenile level that never evolved beyond the point of arguing over who has the biggest balls. Ignoring them is defeating them on an intellectual level and giving them (in their small mind), a false sense of security should they take it a step further and try to assault you, because then you're fully licensed to fuck them up - and see them prosecuted for it in a court. No doubt some will disagree with this approach, and it's never an easy decision to make especially when the adrenaline's flowing. My experience has told me to play it cool and go nuclear as and when necessary.. just ride on an forget them; if they want to take it further then like I said things can only get worse for them - not you. Don't play by their rules. Take care bro.
Rate this comment:
+
2
-
RJ57 VJN 2016-04-21 12:06:55

aggressive beeping, driving on the phone, close pass - overtaking towards oncoming traffic, cuts in, slows down to stop vehicle below, swerves towards them, threatening behaviour, concealed weapon tries to attack cyclist.... the list is endless!
Rate this comment:
+
3
-

Add comment

Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Select files
You agree that you accept our rules

Worst drivers in November

  1. MLP 2010
  2. NG64 LXL
  3. KP68 VDV
  4. FN66 JYU
  5. B16 TAJ
  6. RF12 HKU
  7. MT17 VCF
  8. HF69 PGZ
  9. KV59 YWN
  10. CJ19 NHL

View drivers' rankings from previous months »

Do you like us?
or transfer some Bitcoins to 1L9Sd6UhYrugmYzp8Zv4iQtZoLRLdvWHPV