Registration plate RV56JSZ
Official local mnemonic: Reading
Postal area: Reading
Issued: between september 2006 and february 2007
Blue Bmw 318, manufactured in 2006, first registered on 1 December 2006. Cylinder capacity: 1995cc, CO2 emissions: 182 g/km.
As of 10 March 2017 this vehicle had done 123,737 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 144,300 miles.
SORN
✗ No MOT Expired: 9 March 2018

MOT history

Test dateExpiry dateResultOdometer reading
2017-03-102018-03-09 Pass123,737
2016-02-022017-02-01 Pass120,793
2016-02-02- Fail120,793
2015-07-072016-07-06 Pass120,566
2014-06-062015-06-05 Pass113,471
  • Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
2014-06-06- Fail113,471
  • Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
2013-06-022014-06-01 Pass106,559
2012-03-142013-03-13 Pass99,521
2010-12-012011-12-18 Pass89,432
2009-12-072010-12-18 Pass66,863
  • Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)

Rate driver

2
5

Comments

RV56 JSZ 2015-12-13 09:53:36

One possibility is the car has run flats and the tyre has no air left in it, the speed needs to be kept low and the hazards are a way of advising people to be wary. If this was the case then it seems quite sensible to me.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
RV56 JSZ 2015-12-12 17:57:17

I agree Shamus, ordinarily I would have over taken it. Trouble was, somebody at the hire company left the oil cap off my brand new car with oil being blown over the engine so I didn't want to kick it down (it's an auto) for such a short distance to the exit. I was on my way back to drop it off. There was a fair distance to begin with and I slowed down to match but he kept going slower and slower until we got down to 40 and I was getting closet to him. I didn't get angry with him but he didn't know my reason for not overtaking and I didn't know his for progressively slowing down.
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
RV56 JSZ 2015-12-12 01:08:47

So tell me RV56JSZ, what was this all about?
Rate this comment:
+
1
-
RV56 JSZ 2015-12-12 17:51:18

This vehicle hasn't got any tax either, so is driving illegally. Shamus, I think the distance was initially good and was not intimidating at all. Once the driver slowed down, maybe the camera car got a little too close, but I don't think slowing down is going to get people to increase their distance anyway?
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
RV56 JSZ 2015-12-12 16:34:29

What was that?
It appeared to me that the slow moving driver in front felt you were driving too close, always remember that on dark unlit roads the vehicle in front will not be able to see as far as you in the following vehicle by not having the benefit of the car in fronts headlights whereas you would have an extra 20 or so meters of lit road from the car in front. Its possible that they may have poor night vision as well. Personally for the sake of safety, I would have just over taken it..
Rate this comment:
+
0
-

Add comment

Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Select files
You agree that you accept our rules

Worst drivers in November

  1. LC06 OPH
  2. KP68 VDV
  3. FN66 JYU
  4. DK55 XAT
  5. MLP 2010
  6. RF12 HKU
  7. B16 TAJ
  8. KV59 YWN
  9. BD54 ELC
  10. WG02 NFE

View drivers' rankings from previous months »

Do you like us?
or transfer some Bitcoins to 1L9Sd6UhYrugmYzp8Zv4iQtZoLRLdvWHPV