Registration plate
Official local mnemonic: Scotland Postal area: Glasgow
Issued: between march 2010 and august 2010 Silver Vauxhall Corsa, manufactured in 2010, first registered on 1 March 2010. Cylinder capacity: 1229cc, CO2 emissions: 124 g/km.
Imagine I didn't pay my vehicle tax and was caught out on the road by ANPR/police, and when asked why no tax, I say because "it doesn't exist" "its an imaginary tax". (LMFAO) They would probably ask me to take a drug test!
2019-02-28 13:49:30 You haven't provided any evidence to the effect. You're basically saying God exists because you think he does. Prove your point or just push off? You're flogging your own dead horse here.
Please don't feed the troll still living in the past (the 1930's to be precise lol). The facts have already ousted them.
The BBC: "But road tax was abolished in 1937 and replaced by Vehicle Excise Duty.
This is a tax on cars, not roads, and it goes straight into the general Treasury fund. Many government agencies have now started calling VED "car tax" but it might be classified as a pollution tax, since it's now based on the size of engine and emissions. Ultra-low emissions vehicles are exempted."
The DVLA: "vehicle tax"
The Post Office: "Car tax".
Gov.uk: "Car tax"
The AA: "Car Tax".
The idiot gets it but won't relent, because they clearly think they are better than the rest of us with their senile "Road Tax" fallacy. I just hope they don't take it out on road users going about their lawful business..or that if they do, someone has a camera to film it for later use :)
Fact: Vehicle tax is neither a tax on roads nor fee to use them. You however have deliberately attempted to conflate your bogus tax with vehicle tax, which is an entirely different thing.
Vehicle tax, as describe countless times to people of reasonable mind, is based on emissions. Hence the reason some vehicles don't pay any..oh the shock! a vehicle on the road and not paying for it, in your book!
You think you clever? Then please, show some aptitude and stop trolling. You are making an even bigger ass of yourself it seems. And check your vehicle tax "DETAILS" are up-to-date before you take to the road.
There you go. Apparently everyone in that list, including the Times and the BBC, are morons in your deluded little bubble. Just remember you have no more rights to the roads than anyone else, cyclists included. That you do not pay directly for roads - everyone does. That the tax you pay is based on emissions - NOT on roads. Learned your lesson yet, or are you still eager to mouth off like a pathetic, drunken moron who doesn't realise the bar's closed and the sensible drinkers have evaded them like the plague? This will be the case here, until you can show you are mature enough to have a civil debate. The admins no doubt have your IP details,
You have not provided evidence to the effect. You have provided nothing but conjecture. If you're so sure then quote the legal basis for your imaginary tax - you won't.
"Road Tax doesn't exist - it's not a tax on the roads; it's a tax on the vehicle's emissions."
Alright smart arse, no need to get anal about it! Everyone knows I mean "Vehicle Tax", and it's a tax to use your vehicle on public roads NOT emissions.
Road Tax / Vehicle Tax - Same thing! Loads of people call it road tax!
Nobody is being a smart arse however you seem eager to argue semantics so here goes..
"Everyone knows I mean "Vehicle Tax"
They don't.
You're not being personally attacked by someone simply pointing out that "Road Tax" does not exist. However you could perhaps take a look at all the video's on social media, all the comments on forums (none of which I am saying are yours), using said fallacy as a pretext for some very ignorant, aggressive and in some cases, threatening behaviour; in particular attacks on cyclists.
Yes, it needs to be explained, that there is no such thing as "Road Tax"; that everyone pays the same; that everyone is equal, including cyclists.
Again, I am not attacking you or trying to sound like a smart ass and I'm sorry of you are offended.
17:30:34 Please stop dealing in fallacies - and use the CORRECT. LEGAL terminology. Why is that so hard? You do NOT pay a tax on roads..how hard can that be for your brain to process? If you think you do then why not provide supporting evidence? Every piece of evidence you've been presented with, you've ignored in favor of your flights of fancy.
Just because you call a dog a cat, doesn't mean to say it is. Repeating it a thousand times won't make any difference my friend. I think you are making a fool of yourself.
"Only vehicles registered on or after 1 March 2001 have the ROAD TAX charges.." Is a total fallacy. You have not more rights to the road than anyone else.
“Road Tax” does not exist, and has not existed since the 1930s. Don't just take my word for it: how about The Times, and HM Revenue & Customs and the Treasury, for starters..
--
'Cyclists and “road tax”: the truth
When a driver scowls at a passing cyclist and shouts: “You have no right to be on the road - you don’t pay road tax!” are they right?
'No, according to advisers at HM Revenue & Customs and the Treasury.
Firstly, “road tax” does not exist, and has not existed since the 1930s. What drivers do pay, however, is Vehicle Excise Duty, which is often known as road tax but is not strictly the same thing. Vehicle Excise Duty - what you pay for your car’s tax disc - is based on your vehicle’s emissions. Since a bike creates no emissions, it is not liable for Vehicle Excise Duty.
Secondly, the money from Vehicle Excise Duty goes into a central pot and does not go directly back into the roads. The maintenance of the highways is, in fact, funded out of general taxation. Cyclists - like everyone else - pay council tax and income tax, which pays for the provision of public services, be it hospitals, trains or roads. In terms of tax contribution, this gives cyclists the same rights as motorists - and, indeed, pedestrians - to use the roads.
And finally, research by British Cycling found that 87 per cent of cyclists also regularly drive cars, and so most cyclists have already paid the same duties as motorists for their cars back home on the drive.
So, from a tax perspective, a cyclist has as much right to be on the road as any other road user and an extra levy would not be warranted. Cyclists have the same rights as motorists to expect that public highways should be designed and maintained to be safe and inviting.'
Coward! Unprovoked verbal abuse to pedestrians. Five boys in car - intimidating for some.
Clearly a new driver with little man syndrome, getting to borrow mummies/ sisters car.
Can you please elaborate on what they allegedly said towards pedestrians? Were there any independent witnesses willing to provide a statement? Any other description of the driver: race/sex/build etc? People who act like this clearly need to be called out for it - regardless of their mode of transport.
All this because someone decided to be a nit-picking twat! LMFAO!!