Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
2018-05-09 | 2019-05-21 | ✓ Pass | 85,331 |
|
2017-05-19 | 2018-05-21 | ✓ Pass | 77,515 |
2016-05-19 | 2017-05-21 | ✓ Pass | 64,204 |
2015-05-22 | 2016-05-21 | ✓ Pass | 58,439 |
- Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Offside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
- Rear exhaust mount broken
- Fuel tank plastic cover insecure
|
2015-05-22 | - | ✗ Fail | 58,439 |
- Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Offside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
- Rear exhaust mount broken
- Fuel tank plastic cover insecure
|
2012-05-31 | 2013-05-30 | ✓ Pass | 56,868 |
- Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- both rear brake discs rusty
- rear silencer deteriating
|
2010-12-13 | 2011-12-16 | ✓ Pass | 52,532 |
2010-12-04 | - | ✗ Fail | 52,462 |
2009-12-05 | 2010-12-16 | ✓ Pass | 46,493 |
- Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
- slight play both front top strut mountings
|
2008-12-06 | 2009-12-16 | ✓ Pass | 40,556 |
2008-12-06 | - | ✗ Fail | 40,556 |
2007-12-15 | 2008-12-16 | ✓ Pass | 36,258 |
2006-12-01 | 2007-12-16 | ✓ Pass | 29,670 |
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
|
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
I can assure you no BB was displayed. I could clearly see no BB was on display when I glanced in through the front offside window. I wasn't prepared to risk walking round to the front of the car to take the photo as I was looking suspicious enough as it was.
I can also assure you that I am not a bitter ex or nasty neighbour. I am just a concerned motorist that gets annoyed at people like this who think they can park where they like because it's private land and any risk of a fine can be ignored.
Regardless whether other disabled bays were empty or not, they could have become occupied at any time and this selfish moron was stopping anyone genuinely disabled from using the bays allocated for them.