Registration plate 
Silver Bmw 318, manufactured in 2000, first registered on 24 March 2000. Cylinder capacity: 1895cc.
As of 16 July 2016 this vehicle had done 113,415 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 180,100 miles.
Silver Bmw 318, manufactured in 2000, first registered on 24 March 2000. Cylinder capacity: 1895cc.As of 16 July 2016 this vehicle had done 113,415 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 180,100 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 24 February 2016
✗ No MOT Expired: 29 June 2016
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-16 | 2017-07-15 | ✓ Pass | 113,415 |
| |||
| 2016-07-15 | - | ✗ Fail | 113,409 |
| |||
| 2015-06-30 | 2016-06-29 | ✓ Pass | 105,355 |
| 2015-06-29 | - | ✗ Fail | 105,353 |
| 2014-06-07 | 2015-06-12 | ✓ Pass | 100,844 |
| 2013-06-13 | 2014-06-12 | ✓ Pass | 95,585 |
| 2012-05-12 | 2013-05-11 | ✓ Pass | 88,381 |
| |||
| 2012-05-11 | - | ✗ Fail | 88,378 |
| |||
| 2011-04-11 | 2012-04-10 | ✓ Pass | 83,504 |
| 2011-04-09 | - | ✗ Fail | 83,504 |
| 2010-03-23 | 2011-04-08 | ✓ Pass | 73,694 |
| 2010-03-23 | - | ✗ Fail | 73,694 |
| 2009-03-27 | 2010-04-08 | ✓ Pass | 65,487 |
| 2009-03-27 | - | ✗ Fail | 65,487 |
| 2008-03-26 | 2009-04-08 | ✓ Pass | 54,479 |
| |||
| 2008-03-26 | - | ✗ Fail | 54,478 |
| |||
| 2007-04-07 | 2008-04-08 | ✓ Pass | 48,168 |
| 2006-03-25 | 2007-04-08 | ✓ Pass | 42,059 |
| |||
Rate driver
Comments
W174 GYX
Dave2017-01-16 09:51:19
Just watched it again and now feel really sorry for the child in the rear seat having to listen to that. Their house must be a wonderful environment for kids.
Just watched it again and now feel really sorry for the child in the rear seat having to listen to that. Their house must be a wonderful environment for kids.
W174 GYX
Ted2017-01-21 19:52:19
What do you mean"boo hoo". The guys an elfin' nutter and needs reporting. You Twat.
What do you mean"boo hoo". The guys an elfin' nutter and needs reporting. You Twat.
W174 GYX
connor2017-01-16 01:53:17
at 4 seconds the bmw can see you coming but didnt slow down, they should have braked and given way in the space. i would say bmw driver at fault. i can see he has kids in the back, i wonder if he threatens to smash them in the face when they are naughty
at 4 seconds the bmw can see you coming but didnt slow down, they should have braked and given way in the space. i would say bmw driver at fault. i can see he has kids in the back, i wonder if he threatens to smash them in the face when they are naughty
W174 GYX
2017-01-16 03:55:54
I'm not sure about that. There's also thinking distance to take into account. It appears the BMW driver was already committed to getting past the parked car. Furthermore it's a bend. There is very little time to see, process, and act upon the information presented (the cam car approaching a bend traveling at near the speed limit). I think both drivers are at fault here, to be honest: the cam car for not driving according to the conditions and the BMW driver for being so aggressive.
I'm not sure about that. There's also thinking distance to take into account. It appears the BMW driver was already committed to getting past the parked car. Furthermore it's a bend. There is very little time to see, process, and act upon the information presented (the cam car approaching a bend traveling at near the speed limit). I think both drivers are at fault here, to be honest: the cam car for not driving according to the conditions and the BMW driver for being so aggressive.
W174 GYX
2017-01-15 23:47:14
I was all for defending you until you made threats.
The cam car is going near the limit on a sharp bend. Parked cars after the bend a car innocently negotiating those cars. Cam car hardly slows down at all, even though the oncoming car is already negotiating the obstructions, and basically has nowhere to go. Totally needless aggression on your part. No, I am not defending someone making threats and I am certainly not the driver - but I don't think the cam car is completely innocent in all this by virtue of their failure to show due care and consideration to other road users. Look at this from the other guy's point-of-view: you come blasting around the corner and won't slow down to let him pass. All it takes is a littler consideration and things like this probably won't happen - I am ONLY posting this registration for debate purposes. Thank you.
I was all for defending you until you made threats.
The cam car is going near the limit on a sharp bend. Parked cars after the bend a car innocently negotiating those cars. Cam car hardly slows down at all, even though the oncoming car is already negotiating the obstructions, and basically has nowhere to go. Totally needless aggression on your part. No, I am not defending someone making threats and I am certainly not the driver - but I don't think the cam car is completely innocent in all this by virtue of their failure to show due care and consideration to other road users. Look at this from the other guy's point-of-view: you come blasting around the corner and won't slow down to let him pass. All it takes is a littler consideration and things like this probably won't happen - I am ONLY posting this registration for debate purposes. Thank you.
W174 GYX
2017-01-16 04:00:52
OK Anon, what about the dashcam car traveling near the speed limit round a sharp bend with parked cars? Wouldn't it be common sense to accept there's a high probability someone else will be coming in the other direction? Wouldn't common sense dictate one should slow down and be prepared to stop? The dash cam car's reaction time is slow it seems, it's like they just want to keep on going and only brake (sharply) because they have to - not because they want to.
You simply don't know if the BMW driver saw the cam car in time, due to the cam car's position and speed. A little less speed and this whole situation might not have happened..
OK Anon, what about the dashcam car traveling near the speed limit round a sharp bend with parked cars? Wouldn't it be common sense to accept there's a high probability someone else will be coming in the other direction? Wouldn't common sense dictate one should slow down and be prepared to stop? The dash cam car's reaction time is slow it seems, it's like they just want to keep on going and only brake (sharply) because they have to - not because they want to.
You simply don't know if the BMW driver saw the cam car in time, due to the cam car's position and speed. A little less speed and this whole situation might not have happened..
W174 GYX
Anon2017-01-16 02:51:57
Anyone with an ounce of intelligence or road sense will know the BMW is at fault and should have given way.
sadly the reason he owns a BMW is the same reason he failed to follow the Highway Code because he's a fucking idiot who thinks it's OK to threaten someone.
I'd ask to police to intervene - yes I know they're busy and short staffed but the more that get away with this the more it will happen and if the authorities get sick and tired of all these "reports" then maybe they will begin to take positive action.... hopefully
Anyone with an ounce of intelligence or road sense will know the BMW is at fault and should have given way.
sadly the reason he owns a BMW is the same reason he failed to follow the Highway Code because he's a fucking idiot who thinks it's OK to threaten someone.
I'd ask to police to intervene - yes I know they're busy and short staffed but the more that get away with this the more it will happen and if the authorities get sick and tired of all these "reports" then maybe they will begin to take positive action.... hopefully
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
starts swearing at my kids because they were looking at him then starts tailgating me end up scrating the whole side of the right side of my car breaking my right wing mirror