Oh, I see the 'cycle-hating troll' Sean Sean is still trawling the Internet looking to vent (including victim-blaming).
Here's just one example of his constant idiocy:
"the car was already in another lane. there is a cycle lane and a traffic lane. both seperate to each other."
Cycle lanes such as this are merely a space ONE THE CARRIAGEWAY reserved for bicycles. Contrary to your illusiuon, cycle lanes of this trype are neither mandatory nor segregated - there is no "traffic lane" and cycle lane; the cyclsit IS traffic and if you do no understand and respect this fact then the solution to your problem Sean is simple: walk.
Folks, what Sean Sean is doing here attempting to distort and deceive, his main objective being to:
a. Deflect any and all blame away from the errant driver
b. Victim blame.
Sean Sean appears to be a very bitter and twisted soul who goes out of his way to cause trouble. I've lost count the number of times he's hung around video's of cyclists and in this particular case he's also against the courts. I blocked him and don't regret not havign to put up with his crap any more.
The road design is also dire.. they put a cycle lane smack bang next to a freaking door zone ffs. Hence, move to the left (not that you have to) and you risk being doored, whereas if you move away from the door zone - as advised - you risk being accused of "not being in your lane" and other such crap from dangerous drivers. The risk of either a door and/or idiot driver is thus amplified. For Christ's sake town planners the dangers here are obvious and yet your continue to design and implement these infernal little 'features'. Do better.. like numerous other countries do.
What a good driver. He could be an advanced driver. Very considerate and kind, church going man. Bless you. Love ya xxxx