DS18 NFC
2020-12-12 01:11:21
Until a pedestrian steps onto the crossing the other driver doesn't have to stop by law. I know it sounds crazy but it's true. Even crazier.. you'd fail a test for this and yet once you pass little if anything will happen unless you hit someone. Crazy.
Until a pedestrian steps onto the crossing the other driver doesn't have to stop by law. I know it sounds crazy but it's true. Even crazier.. you'd fail a test for this and yet once you pass little if anything will happen unless you hit someone. Crazy.
DL66 NVW
2020-12-07 18:34:47
no i agree with the cyclist telling the driver off0- he cant park there, he cant even drive onto it legally, its a pavement, you must not drive onto one. Shared path too, but in principle, it is still a pavement so cars can't go on it. I would actually get off the bike and walk it up over the bonnet, over the roof and down the other side and im not saying that being a kayboard warrior, i would do it knowing i was in the right. Might snap the windscreen but that would still be the drivers fault. Doubt they could prosecute too as you could just ride off. Same goes for wheelchair users, if they have the ability to get off and push the chair over the roof, then do so. Teach the driver they cant dump their stupid audi on pavements.
no i agree with the cyclist telling the driver off0- he cant park there, he cant even drive onto it legally, its a pavement, you must not drive onto one. Shared path too, but in principle, it is still a pavement so cars can't go on it. I would actually get off the bike and walk it up over the bonnet, over the roof and down the other side and im not saying that being a kayboard warrior, i would do it knowing i was in the right. Might snap the windscreen but that would still be the drivers fault. Doubt they could prosecute too as you could just ride off. Same goes for wheelchair users, if they have the ability to get off and push the chair over the roof, then do so. Teach the driver they cant dump their stupid audi on pavements.
DL66 NVW
2020-12-03 01:09:14
I agree with your point in principle, but in my opinion I think you should be more careful how you go about it.
It's not your place to police the roads mate. And when you're ordering people about, they can in some cases turn violent without warning. Whatever point you're trying to be making will be secondary to the simple fact someone told them what to do.
By all means, if that car is blocking your way and you can't get past, then push the mirrors in. Either than or walk in the road. Don't argue with him: simply say he appears to be causing an obstruction - then simply ride on.
And yes, I do think he is causing an obstruction. But please, do not fall into the trap of arguing with someone spoiling for a verbal or other, altercation. Take the moral high ground. Too many nutters about.
I agree with your point in principle, but in my opinion I think you should be more careful how you go about it.
It's not your place to police the roads mate. And when you're ordering people about, they can in some cases turn violent without warning. Whatever point you're trying to be making will be secondary to the simple fact someone told them what to do.
By all means, if that car is blocking your way and you can't get past, then push the mirrors in. Either than or walk in the road. Don't argue with him: simply say he appears to be causing an obstruction - then simply ride on.
And yes, I do think he is causing an obstruction. But please, do not fall into the trap of arguing with someone spoiling for a verbal or other, altercation. Take the moral high ground. Too many nutters about.
DA17 WTG
Hi2020-12-03 18:01:16
This driver nearly caused a crash then started giving the finger, knuckle dragger.
This driver nearly caused a crash then started giving the finger, knuckle dragger.
Also sells wraps and fingers schoolgirls.