Yup, now you guys say that I think you have a point, the camera car definitely has cropped the clip to suit their needs.
I suspect he aggravated the poor victim, and then in retaliation the victim did what the camera car did to them - and sadly the victim ended up on here - he's the one I feel sorry for as without provocation this wouldn't have happened is my opinion.
Winston thats changed my view and would change my vote from thumbs down to thumbs up you are coorrect and there is no way this driver behavied like this without instugatuin from the camera driver cant change vote as it tells me that ive already voted but would give thumbs up otherwise
I see a lot of videos posted where they have been cropped to only show the view which is advantageous to the person doing the filming...this one looks like it's no different.
There is more than we are being shown here, I personally suspect that the filming car did something prior to this incident, maybe even undertaking the car who in turn is undertaking in the clip we are being shown.
A lot of insurance companies will not take video as evidence unless they include a set period before and after the event,
Personally I suspect that both are as guilty as each other, with the filming car being the instigator of the event, and the other car being angered and retaliating. and until we see the full video we will never know.
100% lane hogger should have moved over once you had overtaken the vehicle
i too would like to see what happened before and after as i dont think that we are getting the truth here and the op is hiding something
from what i can tell from the video the op is in the wrong here and took offence at being undertaken, moron its your fault and you should have moved over
You picked it up, it was served. Who's the joke on? Idiot.