Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: Milton Keynes
Postal area: Northampton
Issued: between september 2015 and february 2016
Silver Mercedes-benz E, manufactured in 2015, first registered on 1 September 2015. Cylinder capacity: 2143cc, CO2 emissions: 114 g/km.
As of 5 June 2017 this vehicle had done 79,456 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 567,000 miles.
Official local mnemonic: Milton KeynesPostal area: Northampton
Issued: between september 2015 and february 2016
Silver Mercedes-benz E, manufactured in 2015, first registered on 1 September 2015. Cylinder capacity: 2143cc, CO2 emissions: 114 g/km.
As of 5 June 2017 this vehicle had done 79,456 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 567,000 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 May 2020
✗ No MOT Expired: 3 December 2019
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-05 | 2018-06-04 | ✓ Pass | 79,456 |
| 2016-05-31 | 2017-05-30 | ✓ Pass | 14,150 |
Rate driver
Comments
KU65 SYZ
2017-04-30 22:07:12
Larrry is a cycle-hating troll..don't feed it, ladies and gentlemen. Without food, troll no can has what troll want.
Larrry is a cycle-hating troll..don't feed it, ladies and gentlemen. Without food, troll no can has what troll want.
KU65 SYZ
Sanity2017-04-29 12:09:18
Complaining about cyclists going through red lights while attempting to justify a car going through a red light. Yeah ok.
Complaining about cyclists going through red lights while attempting to justify a car going through a red light. Yeah ok.
KU65 SYZ
cyclist2017-04-28 23:31:34
Another retarded driver typing with one hand whilst the other has his tiny cock in his hand.
Another retarded driver typing with one hand whilst the other has his tiny cock in his hand.
KU65 SYZ
cyclist2017-04-27 12:23:44
Avis now claiming that they're getting a 'refund' of the fine. That'd be a good trick, since they were fined in May of 2016 and only have a month to appeal.
I still want to know - why didn't they give the police the information required?
Avis now claiming that they're getting a 'refund' of the fine. That'd be a good trick, since they were fined in May of 2016 and only have a month to appeal.
I still want to know - why didn't they give the police the information required?
KU65 SYZ
Chris2017-04-28 10:51:43
Looked it up on Twitter just now and it's clear the company are bullshitting in an attempt to kill this story before the press gets hold of it. My opinion of Avid keeps getting worse and worse.
Looked it up on Twitter just now and it's clear the company are bullshitting in an attempt to kill this story before the press gets hold of it. My opinion of Avid keeps getting worse and worse.
KU65 SYZ
Sean2017-04-27 14:42:44
Yes it's a criminal offence not to disclose who as driving which is why they were fined £1000.
How did you find out Avis are claiming they're getting a refund and is there any more information about this incident?
Yes it's a criminal offence not to disclose who as driving which is why they were fined £1000.
How did you find out Avis are claiming they're getting a refund and is there any more information about this incident?
KU65 SYZ
Cyclist 672017-04-25 18:17:32
Bell end thinks that red lights are for other people. Car hire company (Avis) fined £1,000 for failing to reveal who was driving. Were they protecting a member of staff who'd have lost his licence with any more points?
Bell end thinks that red lights are for other people. Car hire company (Avis) fined £1,000 for failing to reveal who was driving. Were they protecting a member of staff who'd have lost his licence with any more points?
KU65 SYZ
John2017-04-26 16:44:13
Was the company director of Avis given penalty points in addition to the £1000 fine?
In other cases where companies have failed to identify the driver (as required by Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988) the director is held personally liable and given 6 points on their driving licence. This is done to stop people registering vehicles in the name of a limited company to avoid points if prosecuted for an offence.
Was the company director of Avis given penalty points in addition to the £1000 fine?
In other cases where companies have failed to identify the driver (as required by Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988) the director is held personally liable and given 6 points on their driving licence. This is done to stop people registering vehicles in the name of a limited company to avoid points if prosecuted for an offence.
KU65 SYZ
Anon2017-04-26 03:18:23
Shame on Avis - Twitter and Facebook (of which I'm not on either) needs this sort of thread ;)
but most likely the loss will be written off because clearly a small fine for RLJ is cheaper than £1000 fine.
Shame on Avis - Twitter and Facebook (of which I'm not on either) needs this sort of thread ;)
but most likely the loss will be written off because clearly a small fine for RLJ is cheaper than £1000 fine.
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Another typical cyclist with a point to prove... it happens, if you weren't so angry all the time (I can only assume why) then you wouldn't be on here crying and you'd have a happier life.
You even want to know classified information now! Why? Are you inspecting the case? No you're just a nosey c*nt with a stick up your arse!
You vile cyclists claim you want to be treated like actual road users, yet you proceed to go through red lights (you know you do) and drive on the wrong side of the road. If you want to be treated like a proper road user you should all have insurance and some form of identification on your "vehicle"
Please just get a life and stop acting like you're actually relevant to the community.