Registration plate 
Official local mnemonic: London
Postal area: Borehamwood
Issued: between march 2010 and august 2010
Black London taxis int Tx4, manufactured in 2010, first registered on 1 March 2010. Cylinder capacity: 2499cc, CO2 emissions: 233 g/km.
As of 14 November 2017 this vehicle had done 145,279 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 307,700 miles.
Official local mnemonic: LondonPostal area: Borehamwood
Issued: between march 2010 and august 2010
Black London taxis int Tx4, manufactured in 2010, first registered on 1 March 2010. Cylinder capacity: 2499cc, CO2 emissions: 233 g/km.
As of 14 November 2017 this vehicle had done 145,279 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 307,700 miles.
✗ Untaxed Tax due: 1 April 2020
✗ No MOT Expired: 23 October 2019
MOT history
| Test date | Expiry date | Result | Odometer reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-14 | 2018-11-13 | ✓ Pass | 145,279 |
| 2017-11-13 | - | ✗ Fail | 145,279 |
| |||
| 2017-04-19 | 2018-04-18 | ✓ Pass | 132,087 |
| 2017-04-14 | - | ✗ Fail | 132,087 |
| |||
| 2016-10-24 | 2017-10-23 | ✓ Pass | 120,927 |
| 2016-10-24 | - | ✗ Fail | 120,927 |
| 2016-04-21 | 2017-04-20 | ✓ Pass | 110,617 |
| 2016-04-20 | - | ✗ Fail | 110,617 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2016-10-19 | ✓ Pass | 103,028 |
| 2015-04-15 | 2016-04-15 | ✓ Pass | 95,387 |
| |||
| 2015-03-26 | 2016-04-15 | ✓ Pass | 95,190 |
| 2014-10-06 | 2015-10-20 | ✓ Pass | 90,530 |
| 2014-10-06 | - | ✗ Fail | 90,530 |
| 2014-04-08 | 2015-04-15 | ✓ Pass | 84,632 |
| 2014-04-08 | - | ✗ Fail | 84,632 |
| 2013-10-21 | 2014-10-20 | ✓ Pass | 78,202 |
| 2013-10-21 | - | ✗ Fail | 78,201 |
| 2013-04-16 | 2014-04-15 | ✓ Pass | 64,533 |
| 2013-04-15 | - | ✗ Fail | 64,533 |
| |||
Rate driver
Comments
LS10 OPV
2017-04-15 03:15:18
Gerald, why would YOU write such tripe? Oh that's right: because you're a troll who most want rid of. Most of the votes on your comments are also negative, and to a large degree. Even in your comment here, all you can do is post abuse.
Why do you come here if you are hated so much by the sane and rational?
Gerald, why would YOU write such tripe? Oh that's right: because you're a troll who most want rid of. Most of the votes on your comments are also negative, and to a large degree. Even in your comment here, all you can do is post abuse.
Why do you come here if you are hated so much by the sane and rational?
LS10 OPV
Gerald Brovloski2017-04-10 11:22:48
Why would you write such a big reply you sad fuck obviously you need anger management and ride a faggot bicycle, you obviously need to sort you fat lemon head out you gimp and learn to drive.
Why would you write such a big reply you sad fuck obviously you need anger management and ride a faggot bicycle, you obviously need to sort you fat lemon head out you gimp and learn to drive.
LS10 OPV
2017-04-09 06:05:09
"the bike swerved all over the road"
- The video clearly doesn't show the bike swerving all over the road.
"roads are made for cars "
Prove it. You can't. Because you're talking absolute rubbish. Roads are for everyone. From a legal basis cars are also there by permission; cycles by right.
"if bike wankers dont like it get off and walk"
If YOU don't like what I've just typed, follow your own advice. I would also advise, given your apparent mental state, that you read the green cross code or let someone hold your hand..
"so may people on bikes jump light"
Open your eyes and get your facts right for once. The cyclist wasn't jumping the red light. Many car drivers also, run red lights, don't have a valid MOT or insurance, speed, tail-gate, and use their vehicle as a weapon. Many people also smoke, and drink. In other words, you are seeking to change the narrative here to suit your argument - and failing miserably.
Are you Sid James? If YOU can't see the wrong in what this driver is doing then YOU are not fit to drive. Belt up!!
"the bike swerved all over the road"
- The video clearly doesn't show the bike swerving all over the road.
"roads are made for cars "
Prove it. You can't. Because you're talking absolute rubbish. Roads are for everyone. From a legal basis cars are also there by permission; cycles by right.
"if bike wankers dont like it get off and walk"
If YOU don't like what I've just typed, follow your own advice. I would also advise, given your apparent mental state, that you read the green cross code or let someone hold your hand..
"so may people on bikes jump light"
Open your eyes and get your facts right for once. The cyclist wasn't jumping the red light. Many car drivers also, run red lights, don't have a valid MOT or insurance, speed, tail-gate, and use their vehicle as a weapon. Many people also smoke, and drink. In other words, you are seeking to change the narrative here to suit your argument - and failing miserably.
Are you Sid James? If YOU can't see the wrong in what this driver is doing then YOU are not fit to drive. Belt up!!
LS10 OPV
2017-04-03 21:52:06
This might sound defeatist to some. I think that in places like London and many, many other parts of England you are going to see incidents like this on account of the population density, the over-reliance on cars, and road system itself which was never originally designed for anything other than horse-drive carriages.
It's only by virtue of that English sense of fair play that you do not see a LOT more people injured and killed.
But what concerns me most here is the blinkered view from some politicians and industrials, all of whom assume that we have some kind of obligation to accept millions more people living in this small country. Most of this increase being down to immigration and natural births (the latter being used to conceal the number of people being born on religious and cultural grounds).
Even with the best intention, we are over capacity. We shouldn't keep ripping up what's left to house even more people whilst fearing being branded racist or xenophobic just for using our common sense. The same is happening in the US, it's the politicians, the industrialists and much of the mainstream media who are behind this surge and every single country it happens there are is irreversible damage.
I often hate commuting in London for this reason..you literally have to have eyes everywhere and anything goes. If I wanted to live like this I'd move to some third-world slum and that's exactly where we are heading. Very quickly.
This might sound defeatist to some. I think that in places like London and many, many other parts of England you are going to see incidents like this on account of the population density, the over-reliance on cars, and road system itself which was never originally designed for anything other than horse-drive carriages.
It's only by virtue of that English sense of fair play that you do not see a LOT more people injured and killed.
But what concerns me most here is the blinkered view from some politicians and industrials, all of whom assume that we have some kind of obligation to accept millions more people living in this small country. Most of this increase being down to immigration and natural births (the latter being used to conceal the number of people being born on religious and cultural grounds).
Even with the best intention, we are over capacity. We shouldn't keep ripping up what's left to house even more people whilst fearing being branded racist or xenophobic just for using our common sense. The same is happening in the US, it's the politicians, the industrialists and much of the mainstream media who are behind this surge and every single country it happens there are is irreversible damage.
I often hate commuting in London for this reason..you literally have to have eyes everywhere and anything goes. If I wanted to live like this I'd move to some third-world slum and that's exactly where we are heading. Very quickly.
LS10 OPV
2017-04-04 23:50:19
Same is happening in other parts of the world. In New York, Toronto and Vancouver as well as New Zealand and Australia (to name a few), we have foreign "investors" and foreign "interests" buying property like crazy, many of them from Asia with big families. The price shoots up and so does the crowding, as it as a case of quantity over quality every single time. There's a whole network encouraging it, with corporate, political and media backing. You walk into a travel shop on the high street and it's like they have red carpet out for people who can barely speak English, yet can somehow manage to get into the places mentioned above fairly unimpeded. Meanwhile the rest of us need a list of entry requirements as long as our arm, including jobs, money, and sponsors. It's not right. It's not us who are raping and pillaging and it's not us who breed like rabbits either, or ram buildings with as many people as possible to shoot the rent up and to hell with health and safety.
It's not being racist or whatever, it's facts. British people (of many colours and faiths) can no longer afford to live in places like this because they are being priced out..and squeezed out.
Same is happening in other parts of the world. In New York, Toronto and Vancouver as well as New Zealand and Australia (to name a few), we have foreign "investors" and foreign "interests" buying property like crazy, many of them from Asia with big families. The price shoots up and so does the crowding, as it as a case of quantity over quality every single time. There's a whole network encouraging it, with corporate, political and media backing. You walk into a travel shop on the high street and it's like they have red carpet out for people who can barely speak English, yet can somehow manage to get into the places mentioned above fairly unimpeded. Meanwhile the rest of us need a list of entry requirements as long as our arm, including jobs, money, and sponsors. It's not right. It's not us who are raping and pillaging and it's not us who breed like rabbits either, or ram buildings with as many people as possible to shoot the rent up and to hell with health and safety.
It's not being racist or whatever, it's facts. British people (of many colours and faiths) can no longer afford to live in places like this because they are being priced out..and squeezed out.
LS10 OPV
Anon2017-04-03 23:31:46
This happened at The Mall which is probably the widest road in London. It's odd that there is no cycle lane here. Your comment did hit the nail on the head though. We have run out of space in London and can't accommodate any more people, vehicles or buildings. Who benefits from filling London to the brim? Certainly not the people that live there.
This happened at The Mall which is probably the widest road in London. It's odd that there is no cycle lane here. Your comment did hit the nail on the head though. We have run out of space in London and can't accommodate any more people, vehicles or buildings. Who benefits from filling London to the brim? Certainly not the people that live there.
LS10 OPV
Sonny2017-04-03 14:46:23
Stupid cyclists wobbling all over the road.
No Helmet.
No Hi-Vis clothes
No training
No insurance.
Over all a menace and a disgrace.
Stupid cyclists wobbling all over the road.
No Helmet.
No Hi-Vis clothes
No training
No insurance.
Over all a menace and a disgrace.
LS10 OPV
2017-04-09 06:06:46
I agree with 18:45:10. It's clear Sonny is trolling. Admins, can you please do something?
I agree with 18:45:10. It's clear Sonny is trolling. Admins, can you please do something?
LS10 OPV
2017-04-07 18:45:10
SONNY = SITE TROLL ALERT!
Don't react to this twat. Don't feed the trolls!
SONNY = SITE TROLL ALERT!
Don't react to this twat. Don't feed the trolls!
LS10 OPV
2017-04-03 15:37:50
As regards training not being required. There are specific traffic violations for cyclists can, and in some cases have, been found culpable. The biggest problem here however is the blinkered, arrogant attitudes of people like Sonny. It's their misguided sense of entitlement coupled with a perchent for victim-blaming that causes many problems on the roads. Some police forces are now making more effort to crack down on such attitudes and the popularity of cameras (for ALL road users) means their nefarious measures can now more easily be exposed.
As regards training not being required. There are specific traffic violations for cyclists can, and in some cases have, been found culpable. The biggest problem here however is the blinkered, arrogant attitudes of people like Sonny. It's their misguided sense of entitlement coupled with a perchent for victim-blaming that causes many problems on the roads. Some police forces are now making more effort to crack down on such attitudes and the popularity of cameras (for ALL road users) means their nefarious measures can now more easily be exposed.
LS10 OPV
2017-04-03 15:33:24
You are a disgrace to this site. Your argument is flawed and you are trying to use it to excuse the driver's actions, which, you have TOTALLY avoided commenting on. Are you the forum troll?
. Helmets are not compulsory and have no bearing here.
. Hi-vis clothing the same. This is also broad daylight.
. Training isn't required by law. Cars however pose a FAR greater threat and therefore the requirement for "training" AND insurance on account of the threat YOU pose. Many cyclists also drive, have 3rd party insurance that covers them.
NONE of this changes the obligation of the DRIVER to over-take only if it is safe or practical. The responsibility lies with them to follow this instruction - not for the cyclist have eyes in the back of their head and yield.
Overall you talk rubbish and act like a typical troll and it's people like YOU who are a disgrace on our roads. You're busted.
You are a disgrace to this site. Your argument is flawed and you are trying to use it to excuse the driver's actions, which, you have TOTALLY avoided commenting on. Are you the forum troll?
. Helmets are not compulsory and have no bearing here.
. Hi-vis clothing the same. This is also broad daylight.
. Training isn't required by law. Cars however pose a FAR greater threat and therefore the requirement for "training" AND insurance on account of the threat YOU pose. Many cyclists also drive, have 3rd party insurance that covers them.
NONE of this changes the obligation of the DRIVER to over-take only if it is safe or practical. The responsibility lies with them to follow this instruction - not for the cyclist have eyes in the back of their head and yield.
Overall you talk rubbish and act like a typical troll and it's people like YOU who are a disgrace on our roads. You're busted.
LS10 OPV
John2017-04-01 19:57:10
London taxi passes a bicycle very close.
And black cab drivers like to describe themselves as "London's finest".
London taxi passes a bicycle very close.
And black cab drivers like to describe themselves as "London's finest".
LS10 OPV
SidusJamus2017-04-03 21:17:33
Very poor driving in my considered opinion. I sincerely hope you reported him to the relevant authority so that they may take approriate and proportionate disciplinary action. Thank you.
Very poor driving in my considered opinion. I sincerely hope you reported him to the relevant authority so that they may take approriate and proportionate disciplinary action. Thank you.
LS10 OPV
Lee2017-04-03 15:31:37
James it's simple really so I'm surprised you had to ask. A bike doesn't need as much space because it's small and the rider has hands at both far ends of the bicycle so has much more control. In a car the driver is controlling a big lump of lethal metal and they are positioned at the front right corner, which makes it easy to misjudge space.
Your question is a bit like asking why pedestrians can walk closely between stopped cars when cars need to leave a much bigger gap when driving past pedestrians.
James it's simple really so I'm surprised you had to ask. A bike doesn't need as much space because it's small and the rider has hands at both far ends of the bicycle so has much more control. In a car the driver is controlling a big lump of lethal metal and they are positioned at the front right corner, which makes it easy to misjudge space.
Your question is a bit like asking why pedestrians can walk closely between stopped cars when cars need to leave a much bigger gap when driving past pedestrians.
LS10 OPV
2017-04-03 02:17:28
Just piss off James. Your trolling isn't welcome here and many people have said so. Start taking the hint: your shit is better off on a site more akin to your interests e.g. your illogical crying.
Just piss off James. Your trolling isn't welcome here and many people have said so. Start taking the hint: your shit is better off on a site more akin to your interests e.g. your illogical crying.
LS10 OPV
James2017-04-02 22:19:51
So it's okay for a cyclist to undertake a car by a few centimetres, but it's not okay for a car to overtake a cyclist by the same margin?
What a stack of shit.
Start cycling with some sanity and respect and perhaps you'll get some back
So it's okay for a cyclist to undertake a car by a few centimetres, but it's not okay for a car to overtake a cyclist by the same margin?
What a stack of shit.
Start cycling with some sanity and respect and perhaps you'll get some back
Add comment
Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
wow cant believe people are thinking the car is in the wrong, the bike swerved all over the road roads are made for cars if bike wankers dont like it get off and walk so may people on bikes jump light think they own the road quite happy to pull out in front of car and then moan when they get hit