Registration plate WP51UEM
Official local mnemonic: West of England
Postal area: Bristol
Issued: between september 2001 and february 2002
Black Mcc City coupe, manufactured in 2002, first registered on 1 January 2002. Cylinder capacity: 599cc, CO2 emissions: 122 g/km.
As of 30 November 2015 this vehicle had done 136,571 miles. Current estimated odometer reading: 160,800 miles.
SORN
✗ No MOT Expired: 29 November 2016

MOT history

Test dateExpiry dateResultOdometer reading
2015-11-302016-11-29 Pass136,571
2015-11-26- Fail136,750
2014-07-212015-07-20 Pass132,707
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2014-07-15- Fail132,708
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2013-07-032014-07-02 Pass126,779
  • Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
2013-07-02- Fail126,799
  • Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
2012-04-262013-05-11 Pass122,162
  • Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
  • Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
  • Offside Rear Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
  • Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
  • airbag light on
  • 1 light in centre brake light out
2012-04-13- Fail122,160
  • Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
  • Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
  • Offside Rear Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
  • Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
  • airbag light on
  • 1 light in centre brake light out
2011-05-122012-05-11 Pass117,549
  • Nearside Rear Direction indicators slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
  • Offside Rear Direction indicators slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
  • Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
  • Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
  • Offside Rear rear brake grabbing slightly (3.7.A.5b)
  • near side rear hand brake outer cable slightly damaged
  • rear brake application slightly uneven
2010-05-082011-05-07 Pass110,586
  • off side front a.b.s wiring insurcure
2010-05-08- Fail110,586
  • off side front a.b.s wiring insurcure
2009-05-062010-05-05 Pass102,331
  • Nearside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
  • Offside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
2009-05-06- Fail102,331
  • Nearside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
  • Offside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
2008-02-282009-02-27 Pass96,469
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2008-02-26- Fail96,469
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
2007-01-112008-01-18 Pass90,654
2006-01-192007-01-18 Pass81,271
2006-01-11- Fail81,269
  • Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  • o/s front tyre 2mm on inside edge

Rate driver

0
1

Comments

WP51 UEM 2015-12-23 09:10:42

I agree he shouldn't have antagonised him but i reckon the smart car driver's response wasn't proportionate. Following him into a car park just to pick a fight is nothing more than just a bully. Reckon you should still hand it to the police after that threat though mate
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
WP51 UEM 2015-12-23 06:50:25

Both as bad as each other
Uploader should of just dropped back and let "the prick" continue - then upload the brake check which would have got more respect

But instead uploader antagonised "the prick" and even went as far as calling him a wanker without the balls to back it up.

If you are going to antagonise the situation make sure you're man enough to man up you big girls blouse
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
WP51 UEM 2015-12-26 16:41:37

I don't agree. He had his family in the car. The other driver completely over-reacted. OP only called him a wanker immediately after he threatened his wife..... fair play to him, I'd have got out the car and pummelled the cunt
Rate this comment:
+
0
-
WP51 UEM 2015-12-22 17:52:24

Unnecessarily aggressive and threatening. After tail-gaiting for a mile he tried to undertake at a roundabout and then decided he wanted to escalate the situation. I had both my wife and son in the car at the time when he made a threat about being my wife’s funeral as well as becoming physically threatening while at the driver’s side. Grade-A tw*t…. in a SMART car!

Rate this comment:
+
1
-

Add comment

Attaching movies and photos (?)
It's enough to include link to photo or youtube or facebook movie into comment's content in order to attach them to the comment
Select files
You agree that you accept our rules

Worst drivers in June

  1. BU53 FPV
  2. GL20 ONN
  3. S671 UOA
  4. KM09 PKU
  5. LJ23 YCT
  6. NA06 AAV
  7. GJ24 NNH
  8. FV04 FWJ
  9. SG10 BZY
  10. DG66 HRA

View drivers' rankings from previous months »

Do you like us?
or transfer some Bitcoins to 1L9Sd6UhYrugmYzp8Zv4iQtZoLRLdvWHPV