L861 CDW
Richard2016-02-17 19:44:32
Hmmm... I wonder if "dad" has read any of these comments - seems to have gone quiet?
Hmmm... I wonder if "dad" has read any of these comments - seems to have gone quiet?
LL65 UFB
Shelford School parking carnage2016-02-10 12:36:43
Yet another double yellow liner creating traffic queues and mayhem at peak morning times into the southern Cambridge villages - selfish and needless as there is a perfectly good car park a short walk around the corner - lazy and inconsiderate!
Yet another double yellow liner creating traffic queues and mayhem at peak morning times into the southern Cambridge villages - selfish and needless as there is a perfectly good car park a short walk around the corner - lazy and inconsiderate!
L861 CDW
Really2016-02-16 10:33:39
Seriously, buy the boy a bike that is the correct size for him, it may help him not wobble all over the road.
You can afford a camera but not safety equipment for your son?
Seriously, buy the boy a bike that is the correct size for him, it may help him not wobble all over the road.
You can afford a camera but not safety equipment for your son?
LA11 AWY
D.2016-02-08 10:53:46
The volkswaken is clearly in the wrong here. She must go into the left hand lane as soon as she has finished overtaking. I see hundreds of dicks like this every day. The RAC did some research and found that middle lane hogging reduces the capacity of the motorway by 30%. So next time all you keyboard heroes that are slagging off the HGV driver are sat in slow moving congestion, remember it's your own fault for encouraging bad driving.
The volkswaken is clearly in the wrong here. She must go into the left hand lane as soon as she has finished overtaking. I see hundreds of dicks like this every day. The RAC did some research and found that middle lane hogging reduces the capacity of the motorway by 30%. So next time all you keyboard heroes that are slagging off the HGV driver are sat in slow moving congestion, remember it's your own fault for encouraging bad driving.
LA11 AWY
onlyme2016-02-07 23:48:36
I see the anti HGV muppets and little willie keyboard warriors are bored today.
It's pointless explaining fact as they cannot comprehend but still I hope the police will have a word in LA11 AWY's empty skull and explain where they failed to drive in a responsible manner.
I see the anti HGV muppets and little willie keyboard warriors are bored today.
It's pointless explaining fact as they cannot comprehend but still I hope the police will have a word in LA11 AWY's empty skull and explain where they failed to drive in a responsible manner.
LA11 AWY
Driver312016-02-07 15:24:16
Tbf, the lorry driver is a dick as usual. If he hadn't had flashed his lights the car may have moved, but the lorry was trying to intimate the car.
And let's face it....the lorry should have backed off.
Tbf, the lorry driver is a dick as usual. If he hadn't had flashed his lights the car may have moved, but the lorry was trying to intimate the car.
And let's face it....the lorry should have backed off.
L861 CDW
Biscuit2016-02-06 14:04:46
I'd let this go. The car despite doing a double overtake was in the other lane and appeared to complete the over-take safely. What immediate danger was there aside from cars to the right potentially being forced into your path by the over-taker? I used to react a lot but not any more because your safety comes first and because it risks you losing concentration. Some people are real dicks in cars, there's no doubt about that (and even bikes), but what I would suggest is unless absolutely necessary, just film them. Do not engage with them. You don't know what your'e dealing with in this country, whether they be British or one of the hordes of foreigners coming over. if you have no choice defend yourself by all means but the rest of the time let it go. If you wish to remonstrate to it peacefully least then if they do anything then it's most likely them that will get in trouble not you. Most drivers feel the same way I think, and most drivers aren't arseholes. Sometimes it's easy to forget that given the sizeable minority who are, but sill. Use a camera and a loud horn, let them be the aggressor - keep away from them.
I'd let this go. The car despite doing a double overtake was in the other lane and appeared to complete the over-take safely. What immediate danger was there aside from cars to the right potentially being forced into your path by the over-taker? I used to react a lot but not any more because your safety comes first and because it risks you losing concentration. Some people are real dicks in cars, there's no doubt about that (and even bikes), but what I would suggest is unless absolutely necessary, just film them. Do not engage with them. You don't know what your'e dealing with in this country, whether they be British or one of the hordes of foreigners coming over. if you have no choice defend yourself by all means but the rest of the time let it go. If you wish to remonstrate to it peacefully least then if they do anything then it's most likely them that will get in trouble not you. Most drivers feel the same way I think, and most drivers aren't arseholes. Sometimes it's easy to forget that given the sizeable minority who are, but sill. Use a camera and a loud horn, let them be the aggressor - keep away from them.
L861 CDW
What2016-02-06 13:58:53
onlyme: "You were cycling side by side on a few occasions which although allowed is blatantly abusing other road users" How was it? Where I live the police cycle that way a lot.. are they abusing people? "Furthermore where is your son's helmet and safety clothing and lights." Where are yours? That's right: they aren't mandatory unless you want to instigate ad hominem attacks? "Yes the car overtook another car and you and your son but had you respected other road users you might not have created this." Logical fallacy. "Blame only yourself for being the worst parent and irresponsible cyclist so far this year...at least you won that." Again, a logical fallacy. This all leads me to ask: what the hell is your point? Are you actually trying to be constructive?????
onlyme: "You were cycling side by side on a few occasions which although allowed is blatantly abusing other road users" How was it? Where I live the police cycle that way a lot.. are they abusing people? "Furthermore where is your son's helmet and safety clothing and lights." Where are yours? That's right: they aren't mandatory unless you want to instigate ad hominem attacks? "Yes the car overtook another car and you and your son but had you respected other road users you might not have created this." Logical fallacy. "Blame only yourself for being the worst parent and irresponsible cyclist so far this year...at least you won that." Again, a logical fallacy. This all leads me to ask: what the hell is your point? Are you actually trying to be constructive?????
Occasionally it gets a wash...... and the car !!