Incase his insurance providers check in the future and there are negative comments its safe to assume they're false (unless evidence) since he has an internet following.
I nearly got side swiped by this A Hole coming down Bluebell hill - I was going at 70 in the right lane and he undertook me, must have been going a lot faster then weaved in front and slammed on the brakes - thinks he's Iceman from Top Gun with the shades.
Scary to think the driver not only felt entitled to force you out the way, but also lacked the sense to realise the approaching danger. It is my understanding that one should only over-take if it is both safe and practical..it was neither. Furthermore cyclist's don't have mirrors, indicators or brake lights. They can also swerve, bounce and come off at any time , especially with the state of British roads. No doubt some are pricks; I ride and drive and I have had my fair share of heated exchanges shall we say, with idiots on bikes thinking the rules of the road don't apply to them. Does this driver think all cyclists are like that? Do they think the rules don't apply to their driving? The latter seems a logical assumption, based on their apparent and dangerous disregard for the cyclist's welfare. I know one thing. If they did this on a driving test they would certainly fail and for good reason. Luckily the cyclist was uninjured but had they been hit the driver would not have stopped and the consequences could have been deadly.
Pikey cunt.